2019
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From groups to communities in western lowland gorillas

Abstract: Social networks are the result of interactions between individuals at different temporal scales. Thus, sporadic intergroup encounters and individual forays play a central role in defining the dynamics of populations in social species. We assessed the rate of intergroup encounters for three western lowland gorilla ( Gorilla gorilla gorilla ) groups with daily observations over 5 years, and non-invasively genotyped a larger population over four months. Both approaches revealed a social sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst our findings suggest that gorilla groups may have regions of priority or even exclusive use close to their home range centre, groups are known to overlap and even peacefully co-exist in other regions of their ranges 46 . The smaller central home range regions could feasibly be defended by physical aggression, using olfactory cues 47 or through chest-beating 48 , a commonly observed form of between-group communication in gorillas 26 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whilst our findings suggest that gorilla groups may have regions of priority or even exclusive use close to their home range centre, groups are known to overlap and even peacefully co-exist in other regions of their ranges 46 . The smaller central home range regions could feasibly be defended by physical aggression, using olfactory cues 47 or through chest-beating 48 , a commonly observed form of between-group communication in gorillas 26 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The flexible system of defending and sharing space suggested here, combined with growing evidence for long term social bonds between gorilla groups 26,53,54 and a far more dynamic social system than previously thought 46,55 , implies the presence of a complex social structure in gorillas where between-group interactions are influenced by many factors including social affiliations, kinship and the defence of space. Gorillas may therefore represent a valuable model system for investigating how elements of territoriality can occur simultaneously with affiliative between-group interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This could be due to spatial proximity and a higher chance of intergroup encounters facilitating female transfers or immediate involuntary female transfers following the sudden dissolution of a group due to the death of the silverback (Stokes et al 2003). This impression of connectedness fits the observation that infectious disease outbreaks, like Ebola, have severe consequences on western lowland populations due to their changing group membership and incorporation of new individuals (Bermejo et al 2006;Genton et al 2015;Le Gouar et al 2009;Forcina et al 2019).…”
Section: Space Use Over Time and Group Overlapmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The fraction of MCP that did not overlap with any other group was typically less than 20%. This is consistent with other studies on western lowland gorillas revealing variable extent of home range overlap between groups and frequent non-aggressive intergroup encounters (Seiler et al in prep., Bermejo 2004;Doran-Sheehy et al 2004;Doran and McNeilage 1998;Tutin 1996;Forcina et al 2019). In addition to the inherent problems of the MCP method (Burgman and Fox 2003;Börger et al 2006) a caveat of our study is that the MCPs encompass areas that are accessible for gorillas but also areas that are not accessible for gorillas (like water surfaces) and are constructed over a time frame of up to 2.8 years thus they do not necessarily represent home ranges.…”
Section: Space Use Over Time and Group Overlapmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation