2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-020-00691-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From hogs to HABs: impacts of industrial farming in the US on nitrogen and phosphorus and greenhouse gas pollution

Abstract: Nutrient pollution and greenhouse gas emissions related to crop agriculture and confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) in the US have changed substantially in recent years, in amounts and forms. This review is intended to provide a broad view of how nutrient inputs-from fertilizer and CAFOsas well as atmospheric NH 3 and greenhouse gas emissions, are changing regionally within the US and how these changes compare with nutrient inputs from human wastewater. Use of commercial nitrogen (N) fertilizer in the U… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
(264 reference statements)
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most poorly understood process in the nitrogen (N) cycle is denitrification, the dominantly anaerobic microbial conversion of nitrate (NO 3 − ) and nitrite (NO 2 − ) to the gases nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N 2 O), and dinitrogen (N 2 ; Almaraz et al., 2020). This process is of great interest because it can significantly reduce pools of reactive N (and thus productivity) in ecosystems and because NO 3 − , NO, and N 2 O cause diverse air and water pollution problems, with direct links to human health (Davidson et al., 2012; Glibert, 2020) and fertilization costs. Denitrification is difficult to quantify because of problematic measurement techniques (especially for N 2 due to high background signals and insufficient analytical precision), high spatial and temporal variability, and a lack of methods for scaling point measurements to larger areas (Groffman et al., 2000, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most poorly understood process in the nitrogen (N) cycle is denitrification, the dominantly anaerobic microbial conversion of nitrate (NO 3 − ) and nitrite (NO 2 − ) to the gases nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N 2 O), and dinitrogen (N 2 ; Almaraz et al., 2020). This process is of great interest because it can significantly reduce pools of reactive N (and thus productivity) in ecosystems and because NO 3 − , NO, and N 2 O cause diverse air and water pollution problems, with direct links to human health (Davidson et al., 2012; Glibert, 2020) and fertilization costs. Denitrification is difficult to quantify because of problematic measurement techniques (especially for N 2 due to high background signals and insufficient analytical precision), high spatial and temporal variability, and a lack of methods for scaling point measurements to larger areas (Groffman et al., 2000, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight of the 10 cities in the United States identified as most susceptible to climate change costs are in Florida (Muro et al, 2019). Generalized as warming, acidification and deoxygenation (Gobler, 2020), the specific climate change impacts likely to impact Florida include sea-level rise (Reece et al, 2013), increasingly intense weather and heavy precipitation events (Knutson et al, 2010;Emanuel, 2013;Contento et al, 2018Contento et al, , 2019Marsooli et al, 2019), marine fishery declines (Cheung et al, 2009), water pollution (Moss et al, 2011;Glibert, 2020), and reef and habitat loss (Snedaker, 1995;Manzello et al, 2007;Tobey et al, 2010;Okazaki et al, 2017). There is a general consensus that climate change is predicted to increase the frequency of both freshwater (O'Neil et al, 2012;Havens and Paerl, 2015) and marine HABs (Hallegraeff, 2010) through a variety of direct and indirect mechanisms.…”
Section: Climate Change and Florida Habsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HAB increases are attributed to a variety of reasons that vary with the species and the geographical areas involved (Anderson, 1989;Hallegraeff, 1993;Burkholder, 1998;Glibert et al, 2005;Glibert and Burkholder, 2006). These include increasing coastal nutrient inputs and eutrophication, coastal development, industrial and agricultural intensification (Smayda, 1990;Anderson et al, 2002Anderson et al, , 2008Heisler et al, 2008;Glibert, 2020), ballast water transport (Hallegraeff and Gollasch, 2006;Doblin et al, 2007;Smayda, 2007), increases in shellfish aquaculture (Shumway, 2011), climate change (Dale et al, 2006;Moore et al, 2008;Hallegraeff, 2010;O'Neil et al, 2012;Gobler, 2020) and a potential observer effect. In most cases, there is probably not a single cause underlying increases in a HAB's frequency, distribution or toxicity, but rather a complex interplay between these external pressures and the unique physiology of the HAB species involved which allows it to dominate under certain conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the broad range of reservoirs and conditions represented in this study, we expect that these results will be useful for comparison to other regions that have both mountain and plains lakes, especially since monitoring and treating freshwater HABs is an increasingly important issue in the global drinking water supply (e.g. Backer et al, 2015;Schmale et al, 2019;Glibert, 2020). However, it should be noted that other regions may have different regional factors such as climate, altitude and precipitation patterns that may influence local water quality and treatment, warranting further investigation.…”
Section: Implications For Drinking Water Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freshwater HABs, such as in Lake Erie, can be large enough to be monitored by satellite remote sensing (Schmale et al, 2019). HABs are also increasing in frequency due to increased nutrient supplies (Ho and Michalak 2017;Del Giudice et al, 2018;Glibert, 2020) and warming temperatures (e.g. Pearl and Scott, 2010), leading to contamination of municipal water supplies (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%