2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-020-03393-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From immune to olfactory expression: neofunctionalization of formyl peptide receptors

Abstract: Variations in gene expression patterns represent a powerful source of evolutionary innovation. In a rodent living about 70 million years ago, a genomic accident led an immune formyl peptide receptor (FPR) gene to hijack a vomeronasal receptor regulatory sequence. This gene shuffling event forced an immune pathogen sensor to transition into an olfactory chemoreceptor, which thus moved from sensing the internal world to probing the outside world. We here discuss the evolution of the FPR gene family, the events … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intriguingly, one of the molecules found to be differentially expressed in the lungs of COVID-19 patients is the formyl peptide receptor, FPR2/FPRL1/ALX 34 , a G protein-coupled receptor and homolog of the Fpr family of vomeronasal receptors in mice. While FPR2 and its mouse equivalent are not considered to act as vomeronasal receptors 35,36 , it is active both in the brain and in immune cells, and is best known for its proin ammatory or in ammation-resolving actions depending on the activating ligand and signaling pathway triggered 37 . It also binds a variety of viral peptides and regulates viral RNA replication [38][39][40] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intriguingly, one of the molecules found to be differentially expressed in the lungs of COVID-19 patients is the formyl peptide receptor, FPR2/FPRL1/ALX 34 , a G protein-coupled receptor and homolog of the Fpr family of vomeronasal receptors in mice. While FPR2 and its mouse equivalent are not considered to act as vomeronasal receptors 35,36 , it is active both in the brain and in immune cells, and is best known for its proin ammatory or in ammation-resolving actions depending on the activating ligand and signaling pathway triggered 37 . It also binds a variety of viral peptides and regulates viral RNA replication [38][39][40] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TAARs are also expressed in receptor neurons of the GG (157). Apart from a particular vomeronasal receptor (V2R83) that is expressed in the ciliated receptor neurons of the GG (34,153), all vomeronasal receptors of type 1 and type 2 (V1Rs and V2Rs) and all formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) are exclusively expressed in microvillous receptor neurons (25,35,(158)(159)(160). Differently from the above, the members of the membrane-spanning 4A receptors (MS4As) are coexpressed with GC-D in receptor neurons of the necklace subsystem that characteristically have neither cilia nor microvilli (25,38,149,150).…”
Section: Olfactory Ensheathing Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the discovery of the first vertebrate odorant receptor gene family, whose members have been generically named OR-type receptors (151), five additional receptor gene families have been discovered (see FIGURE 6): 1) two families of vomeronasal receptors [V1Rs and V2Rs (12,13,19,25,35,341)], 2) a family of aminergic receptors, the so-called TAARs (19,25,152,342,343), 3) FPRs (13,35,158,261,344), and 4) MS4As (19,38,149,150). The two families of vomeronasal receptors were named according to their expression site in mammals, the VNO.…”
Section: Receptor Gene Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the human genome contains only six functional and single-copy trace amine–associated receptor genes ( 21 , 22 ). Humans also lack vomeronasal-specific formyl peptide receptors and vomeronasal type 2 receptors ( 21 , 22 , 23 ). Moreover, only five functional vomeronasal type 1 receptors have been reported to date; however, their direct functional importance in pheromone detection is highly debatable ( 24 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%