2011
DOI: 10.1086/661645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Information Theory to French Theory: Jakobson, Lévi-Strauss, and the Cybernetic Apparatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this passage, Jakobson seems to have a primarily technical view of the communication problem in mind, like that evident in the work of Claude Shannon (see Geoghegan () and Jakobson () for Jakobson's view of “Information Theory”). Like Shannon's (:31) theory of communication, Jakobson appears mostly concerned with the “engineering problem” of language, although he mentions some tropic uses of contact in his definition.…”
Section: Contact Tropes and The Two Phaticitiesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this passage, Jakobson seems to have a primarily technical view of the communication problem in mind, like that evident in the work of Claude Shannon (see Geoghegan () and Jakobson () for Jakobson's view of “Information Theory”). Like Shannon's (:31) theory of communication, Jakobson appears mostly concerned with the “engineering problem” of language, although he mentions some tropic uses of contact in his definition.…”
Section: Contact Tropes and The Two Phaticitiesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Many of these ideas had been developed in the crucible of wartime laboratories, including the linking of education to machinic circuits, which had been utilized at scale to train military operatives. After the war, this research was strongly supported by the largesse of Rockefeller and other American philanthropic foundations that promoted an apolitical, technophilic approach to education (Geoghegan, 2011). As Turner and Larson put it, «no intellectual movement dominated the postwar American intellectual landscape as completely as cybernetics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Far from a pseudo-mathematical mystification, as many Anglo-American anthropologists learnt it [33][34][35], Lévi-Strauss' structural method originated in mathematics and in applied group theory, dealing primarily with the algebraic models of kinship structures [36][37][38][39]. Afterwards, it has gone on to be well received by modern scholars seeking to study culture and society by formal means [40][41][42][43][44]. The majority of commentators, either admirers or critics, have retained from the structural analysis of myth only its capacity to disclose stable, common, and probably universal frameworks.…”
Section: Introduction To Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%