“…The auditors cannot obtain an absolute assurance, especially because there are inherent limitations of an audit caused by factors such as: the use of sampling; the shortcomings of any accounting and internal control system; the fact that most evidence is persuasive rather than conclusive -based on deductions rather than beliefs; the need for the audit to be conducted within a reasonable period of time and at a reasonable cost) and the fact that the opinion is based on professional judgment used in obtaining sufficient appropriate evidence (e.g., decision of nature, timing and extent of the audit procedures) and drawing conclusions based on the evidence obtained (e.g., evaluating the reasonableness of the accounting estimates when preparing the financial statements). Thus, the examination made by professional, in order to appreciate the compliance with regulations, can lead to an increased confidence in a more or less faithful image of the financial position, performance and changes in financial position of an organization (Enachi & Andone, 2015). According to IAASB (2018), the professional judgment represents the application of relevant training, knowledge and experience, within the context provided by auditing, accounting and ethical standards, in making informed decisions about the courses of action that are appropriate in the circumstances of the audit engagement.…”