The current globalizing world stimulates many doubts. Doubtfulness is a starting point for inner dialogue. Internal dialogical activity often reduces the experience of uncertainty by integration of contrasting ideas. Sometimes, however, the result is quite opposite -doubts grow rather than being reduced. The paper proposes a dialogical model of doubtfulness and presents empirical findings which are consistent with the model. Additionally, the functions of doubtfulness and internal dialogue in philosophy and science are discussed. On one hand, as empirical results show, doubtfulness can be linked to anxiety which blocks human thinking and acting. On the other hand, as exemplified by Galileo, doubt demands a deeper analysis of the situation and is conducive to human development, in personal or even in socio-cultural space.
DOUBTFULNESS -A DIALOGICAL PERSPECTIVEDoubtfulness seems to describe human condition from the very beginning of homo sapiens. However, culture can maximize doubts, especially those concerning the self. As Leary (2004) argues, our self is a permanent source of numerous inadaptive voices which erode our self-confidence, question our priorities and principles, or create confusion as to our strivings and goals. Moreover, the current globalizing world, or more precisely the current relativistic culture and free market of values, stimulate many doubts and arouse internal conflicts between opposite ideas. These are serious problems which also concern our identity, because on the one hand people are aware of a multitude of incoherent possibilities, while on the other they feel pressure to make decisions and life choices about their personal status, psychosexual orientation, profession, career, future and so on. Such a situation can increase personal or social doubts (Oleś & Batory, 2008