2008
DOI: 10.1080/10720530802071476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Internal Interlocutors to Psychological Functions of Dialogical Activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship with Neuroticism was also replicated using the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire -Revised (0.39, p < 0.001). Generally, the higher the level of Neuroticism and Openness, the higher the level of internal dialogical activity (Puchalska-Wasyl et al, 2008). This is probably modified by developmental factors since, in adolescents, internal dialogicality corresponds more strongly with Neuroticism than with Openness (in students, more strongly with Openness or Neuroticism, depending on the sample), while in the middle-aged samples the internal dialogical activity corresponds more strongly with Openness than with Neuroticism (Oleś & Puchalska-Wasyl, 2012).…”
Section: Dialogue and Doubtfulness In The Context Of Empirical Findingsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relationship with Neuroticism was also replicated using the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire -Revised (0.39, p < 0.001). Generally, the higher the level of Neuroticism and Openness, the higher the level of internal dialogical activity (Puchalska-Wasyl et al, 2008). This is probably modified by developmental factors since, in adolescents, internal dialogicality corresponds more strongly with Neuroticism than with Openness (in students, more strongly with Openness or Neuroticism, depending on the sample), while in the middle-aged samples the internal dialogical activity corresponds more strongly with Openness than with Neuroticism (Oleś & Puchalska-Wasyl, 2012).…”
Section: Dialogue and Doubtfulness In The Context Of Empirical Findingsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to Hermans, the dialogical self is a dynamic multiplicity of relatively autonomous I-positions (different points of view available to a person) which are present in an imaginary space of mind, endowed with voices and intertwined with each other like people in social relationships (Hermans, 2003). Those relationships between I-positions can have three main forms, namely: monologue, change of perspective and dialogue (Puchalska-Wasyl, 2006, 2010Puchalska-Wasyl, Chmielnicka-Kuter, & Oleś, 2008). An internal monologue can be defined as a situation when only one I-position of the dialogical self is speaking, whereas the other one is a silent but active listener who has a strong influence on the utterances of the first I-position.…”
Section: Doubtfulness -A Dialogical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social support consists of a whole range of ways in which people can tacitly or explicitly help one another to improve the quality of their lives, and it is found to be beneficial for reducing stress, decreasing feelings of loneliness and isolation, getting hold of knowledge and information and learning strategies to cope with the situation people are facing [16].…”
Section: Social Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research topic has been taken so that the earlier studies have defined that the support is a function of internal dialogue [16]. At the same time, social support plays an important role in coping with stress.…”
Section: The Importance Of the Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of the Self Confrontation Method can be found in a study by Puchalska-Wasyl, Chmielnicka-Kuter and Oleś (2008). Role-play was used to explore the impact of taking the perspective of a hero upon participants' self-narratives.…”
Section: Self-confrontation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%