2018
DOI: 10.1163/15718123-01802003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Kampala to New York—The Final Negotiations to Activate the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over the Crime of Aggression

Abstract: The article focusses on the final negotiations this December during the Assembly of States Parties meeting, where states decided to activate the icc’s jurisdiction over the crime of aggression. The article commences with a brief background on prosecuting the crime, the negotiation of the definition and conditions for the exercise of icc jurisdiction over it, and the Kampala Review Conference adoption of the crime. It then discusses the dispute as to jurisdiction that developed post-Kampala, and how it was appa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Resolution is upheld (ICC, 2017), the ICC would only have jurisdiction over the crime where a State Party that has ratified the Kampala amendment attacks another State Party that has also ratified the Kampala amendment (see Trahan, 2018). 27 Ironically, this was an exemption that the US delegation negotiated, possibly supported by a few other states, at the ICC Review Conference in Kampala, Uganda (Trahan, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Resolution is upheld (ICC, 2017), the ICC would only have jurisdiction over the crime where a State Party that has ratified the Kampala amendment attacks another State Party that has also ratified the Kampala amendment (see Trahan, 2018). 27 Ironically, this was an exemption that the US delegation negotiated, possibly supported by a few other states, at the ICC Review Conference in Kampala, Uganda (Trahan, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 In any event, the cyberattack would need to be "manifest," such that it is not de minimis (insufficient in gravity and/or scale) and/or "super clear" in terms of its illegality (meeting the required "character"). Yet, because of seemingly extensive jurisdictional limitations -if they are valid (see Trahan, 2018) -it could be quite difficult to trigger ICC jurisdiction regarding the crime of aggression, absent a UN Security Council referral. 26 Returning to the example of election interference, this author doubts that the elements of the crime of aggression would be satisfied.…”
Section: Cyberattacks As the Crime Of Aggression Under The Rome Statutementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Security services also face similar difficulties while tracking and tracing arguments on those sites. This occurs because these groups often adopt the hitand-run approach which makes them disappear and re-appear with different profiles and titles (Trahan, (2016).…”
Section: The Importance Of Cyber Security In National Security Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(emphasis added). 97 The ICJ's Certain Expenses Advisory Opinion has been construed to make the requirement of good faith applicable to voting, so there is nothing that makes the act of voting beyond judicial scrutiny. See Anne Peters, "The Security Council's Responsibility to Protect," 43-44 (the obligation of good faith carries over to UN voting, including on the Security Council: UN members must exercise their voting power "in good faith, in accordance with the Purposes and Principles of the Organization and in such a manner as not to involve any breach of the Charter.…”
Section: Legality Concerns As To Veto Use and Aggressionmentioning
confidence: 99%