Origins of Sound Change 2013
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.003.0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From long to short and from short to long: Perceptual motivations for changes in vocalic length

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of st measures the distance from F 01 (Hz) to F 02 (Hz) [63]. We set F 02 to be 130Hz, the same value chosen for the offset F0 value as in [36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of st measures the distance from F 01 (Hz) to F 02 (Hz) [63]. We set F 02 to be 130Hz, the same value chosen for the offset F0 value as in [36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, he highlights an interaction between the influence of vowel height and tone on perceived duration: across tone height (high vs. low) and across dynamic tones (rising vs. falling), their effects are reduced in shorter syllables, whereas across vowel height ([a] vs. [i]) and across tonal contour (contour vs. level), their effects are lessened in longer syllables [62]. Moreover, Lehnert-Lehouillier points out that the reported impact of F0 patterns on length perception may be dependent on language background [63]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where F 01 and F 02 represent the lower F 0 and the higher F 0 , and the number of st measures the distance between F 01 and F 02 in Hz (Lehnert-LeHouillier, 2013 ). Following Xu et al ( 2006 ), we set the F 02 -value at 130 Hz, and calculated the F 01 -value based on the chosen F 02 -value and the intercept value of −2.2st.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%