From “Made in China” to “Innovated in China”: Necessity, Prospect, and Challenges

Abstract

After more than three decades of high growth based on its low-wage advantage and relatively favorable demographics—in combination with market-oriented reforms and openness to the world economy—China is at a crossroads with a much higher wage and a shrinking work force. Future growth will depend, by necessity, more on the generation of increased productivity, and domestic innovation will play an important part in this. In this paper, we assess the likelihood that China can make the necessary transition. Using data on expenditure on research and development, and patent applications, receipts, and citations, we show that the Chinese economy has become increasingly innovative. We will argue that rising wages and expanding markets are among the important drivers of China's growth in innovation. On the other hand, we find evidence of resource misallocation in the innovation area: while state-owned firms receive more subsidies, private firms exhibit more innovation results. Innovation can presumably progress even faster if resource misallocation can be tackled.

Sino-American Clash of Hegemony: An Analysis of <i>US-China Trade War</i>

“…Trump is more concerned about this quite rise. Those concerns include US complaints about Chinese intellectual property theft and industrial subsidies, centered on Beijing's state-backed "Made in China 2025" initiative, a program to turn China into a leader in a range of advanced technologies (Wei, Xie, & Zhang, 2017).…”

The Impact of State-Owned Enterprises on China’s Economic Growth

“…Major technical innovations require massive investments but do not necessarily bring significantly more patents, which would reduce the measured “efficiency” of R&D activities by that method. Therefore, the evidence raised by Wei, Xie, and Zhang (2017) does not demonstrate that SOEs are less efficient in innovation; on the contrary, it might be the case that SOEs concentrate their R&D on major innovations.…”

“…If that were the case, there might be more technical progress associated with fewer SOEs. Along this line, in an influential study, Wei, Xie, and Zhang (2017) argue that SOEs’ performance in innovation is lackluster compared to private enterprises because they find the number of patents for every 10 million yuan of firm-level investment in R&D is much higher in non-SOEs than in SOEs. The authors use a measure of the efficiency of R&D activities based on patent achievement.…”

Revisiting tourism’s additional impact on income

“…The results from the two measures are different as the ratio of research input to output (the patent-R&D ratio) has changed substantially (Kortum, 1993). A number of studies use successful patent applications to measure the output of innovation (Ang and Madsen, 2015; Cui et al, 2017; Czarnitzki and Toole, 2011; Lampe and Moser, 2013; Moser, 2005; Wei et al, 2017). Following these reports, this study uses the number of successful patent applications to measure the output of research and innovation as a proxy for technology.…”