2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-0947-6_57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Marker to Markerless in Augmented Reality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deep learning is a ground-breaking approach to the use of AI [16,27]. Eliminating markers is still a current topic and there is no single, optimal solution in the literature regarding this issue [28][29][30]. It is expected that the use of AI will eliminate the need to place physical markers, which will lead to full, automatic recognition of the environment and selected elements.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning is a ground-breaking approach to the use of AI [16,27]. Eliminating markers is still a current topic and there is no single, optimal solution in the literature regarding this issue [28][29][30]. It is expected that the use of AI will eliminate the need to place physical markers, which will lead to full, automatic recognition of the environment and selected elements.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue is not really relevant in some AR applications, in which no physical constraints are considered and virtual objects can be placed anywhere, even floating in the air. MR goes one step further, both worlds must be correctly overlapped considering a spatial consistency [8]. This implies the understanding of the user environment and a optimal adjustment in order to locate each virtual model, which represents every indoor facility, where it has been fixed considering both for the design and construction phase and maintenance phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our markerless-based approach implies a significant advance for the use of mixed reality using geometrical data scanned from the user environment in order to know both the user location and orientation in indoor scenarios [8]. In this regard, there have been previous works focused on the removal of physical markers but with the drawback that additional sensing such as radio frequency identification, laser pointing and motion tracking must be added [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this approach is precise and fast, it has several disadvantages, such as the fact that these markers affect user experience and that the tracking is limited to areas where they are visible. This led to the development of markerless tracking [3], which is often based on visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) [4]. SLAM is the task of constructing and updating a 3D map of an unknown environment, while simultaneously tracking the agent's pose within it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%