2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From maturity to value-added innovation: lessons from the pharmaceutical and agro-biotechnology industries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Innogen Centre has proposed a set of principles that could be implemented to deliver smarter regulatory approaches for the life sciences sector [2,29,48,52], including:…”
Section: Conclusion: Towards 'Smart' Regulation and Innovation In Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Innogen Centre has proposed a set of principles that could be implemented to deliver smarter regulatory approaches for the life sciences sector [2,29,48,52], including:…”
Section: Conclusion: Towards 'Smart' Regulation and Innovation In Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This challenge is similar to that faced by the agro-biotechnology industry in the 1980s [3] and is leading to a productivity crisis in which year-on-year increases in R&D investment have not been matched by an equivalent increase in product approvals [2,4]. Although there is debate around the nature and extent of the socalled 'innovation deficit' [5][6][7], there is no doubt that, since the early 1990s companies have not been generating enough new high value compounds to sustain growth [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model, as practiced and honed over half a century is characterised by: identifying promising new blockbuster drugs; conducting large multi-phase clinical trials; and, an extensive marketing and sales presence. During the 1980s and 1990s, big pharmaceutical firms had relatively integrated and complementary R&D strategies (Mittra et al 2010). The top ten firms were large multinationals, all based in the USA (companies like Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibbs and Johnson and Johnson) or Europe (with Glaxo Smith Kline, Astra-Zeneca and Sanofi).…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Drug Innovation Models -Old and Newmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is becoming harder to find truly new drugs in spite of continuing high R&D expenditure. Pharmaceutical company profit rates are falling, although volumes are massive and keep big pharmaceutical firms in the top global companies worldwide (Mittra et al 2010). Another indicator of instability is that large companies are constantly attempting to restructure: cutting in-house R&D units, such as Pfizer's decision in 2011 to close a set of R&D units (Mittra et al 2011); shaving costs through mergers (Mittra 2007); outsourcing R&D to universities and specialist biotechnology firms; and, organisational changes such as encouragement of smaller 'fleetfooted' innovation units within big pharma companies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%