2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.12.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From MCDA to fuzzy MCDA: Presumption of model adequacy or is every fuzzification of an mCDA method justified?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Criteria were selected for comparing fuel cells for onboard use, and fuel cell types were evaluated and ranked according to these criteria using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). The scoring method uses a weighting system (scale of 1 to 3, with 3 indicating the highest importance) based on the importance of the criteria conducted during the integration and operation of the fuel cell system on the vessel under study [9], as well as a ranking system illustrated in Tables 1-3, ranking the qualitative criteria on a scale 1 to 5, with 5 indicating the highest rank. The final comparison tables provide scores for each of the fuel cell options based on evaluation points and weights assigned to each criterion.…”
Section: Decision-making Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criteria were selected for comparing fuel cells for onboard use, and fuel cell types were evaluated and ranked according to these criteria using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). The scoring method uses a weighting system (scale of 1 to 3, with 3 indicating the highest importance) based on the importance of the criteria conducted during the integration and operation of the fuel cell system on the vessel under study [9], as well as a ranking system illustrated in Tables 1-3, ranking the qualitative criteria on a scale 1 to 5, with 5 indicating the highest rank. The final comparison tables provide scores for each of the fuel cell options based on evaluation points and weights assigned to each criterion.…”
Section: Decision-making Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this study can be stated as follows [19,20]: (1) It developed an emerging crisis management and assessment architecture grounded in BSCs for corporate operations in response to COVID-19 impacts. (2) It equipped the BSCs with intertwining relations among indicators via DEMATEL to gain more valuable insights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%