1995
DOI: 10.1016/0190-9622(95)90136-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From mercury to malaria to penicillin: The history of the treatment of syphilis at the Mayo Clinic—1916–1955

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kosters et al suggested that early aortic involvement might occur more often than thought, which is supported by the findings in our study. In addition, neurosyphilis infection can occur during any stage of syphilis4; however, on PET scan in our case series, we did not find any evidence of inflammation in the central nervous system. Neuroinflammation may be difficult to detect, however, on PET scanning due to physiologic cerebral metabolic activity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kosters et al suggested that early aortic involvement might occur more often than thought, which is supported by the findings in our study. In addition, neurosyphilis infection can occur during any stage of syphilis4; however, on PET scan in our case series, we did not find any evidence of inflammation in the central nervous system. Neuroinflammation may be difficult to detect, however, on PET scanning due to physiologic cerebral metabolic activity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Involvement of the aortic root is the most common manifestation of cardiovascular syphilis. In 1926, in his seminal work on the natural history of syphilis, Stokes reported on 200 cases of syphilis and aortic disease 4. Similar reports of aortitis and syphilis were described again in 1942 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is very difficult to compare (or even interpret) the results of the many studies evaluating malarial therapy (e.g., [2][3][4][5][6]) because of differing terminology, subjectivity and reporting time frames. Sartin and Perry [7] stated, "The lack of placebotreated control subjects and the rigidly predefined criteria for therapeutic end points prohibits a true assessment of therapeutic efficacy in the modern sense ( [8]), but it is clear that syphilologists of the time considered the treatment a breakthrough. "…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The publication on the treatment of four syphilitic patients with penicillin by Mahoney et al was soon quickly followed by a case report of the successful resolution of tertiary cutaneous syphilis with penicillin [4]. While the earliest trials of penicillin often failed in hindsight due to incorrect dosing or impurities, the burgeoning success of penicillin in treating tertiary syphilis originally with 320,000 U of penicillin over an 8 day time period lent credence that the cure to syphilis would lay in the newfound drug [5]. Old treatments quickly died out and penicillin abruptly became the mainstay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%