2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From mice to men: Murine models of colorectal cancer for use in translational research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also significant variation in tumor and cachexia development between and within rodent strains that can be attributed, at least in part, to differences in laboratory practices relating to cell storage conditions, passage number, and injection site (80). Genetically engineered mouse models such as the Apc Min/ϩ mouse have also been used in cancer cachexia research, but genetically engineered mouse models can be limited by variability in the incidence of invasive cancers as well as the considerable expense and time required to develop and maintain colonies (34,91). Another major limitation of these models is that the tumor burden is much greater and develop at a much faster pace than that seen in humans, and therefore tumor-derived factors may not play as important as a role in human cardiac cachexia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is also significant variation in tumor and cachexia development between and within rodent strains that can be attributed, at least in part, to differences in laboratory practices relating to cell storage conditions, passage number, and injection site (80). Genetically engineered mouse models such as the Apc Min/ϩ mouse have also been used in cancer cachexia research, but genetically engineered mouse models can be limited by variability in the incidence of invasive cancers as well as the considerable expense and time required to develop and maintain colonies (34,91). Another major limitation of these models is that the tumor burden is much greater and develop at a much faster pace than that seen in humans, and therefore tumor-derived factors may not play as important as a role in human cardiac cachexia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the models used in cardiac cachexia in cancer research have been those requiring the injection of cancer cells previously obtained from donor animals (i.e., C-26 model), which were exposed to carcinogenic agents and therefore lack the natural tumor development seen in humans (91). Moreover, the tumors express the rodent homologs of human tumor genes, which may impact on the testing of targeted therapies and the translation of results (34). There is also significant variation in tumor and cachexia development between and within rodent strains that can be attributed, at least in part, to differences in laboratory practices relating to cell storage conditions, passage number, and injection site (80).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal models are traditionally used to model cell transformation, EMT, and metastasis processes but have limitations due to the inability to take into account and control all experimental variables, as well as the insufficient resolution of the used analytical methods 35 . Despite the fact that in vitro models provide a simplified view of the processes occurring during oncogenesis, they present a powerful tool that complements within in vivo research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xenograft mouse and rat animal models have been established using human colorectal cancer cell lines providing insight into the biological actions and might establish a molecular basis for the development of systemic new cancer therapeutic agents [1719]. In these models however, intra-arterial approaches via the groin artery are not feasible to perform or have only a limited applicability and versatility due to the small animal and vessel size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%