2018
DOI: 10.1111/gbi.12307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From microbial eukaryotes to metazoan vertebrates: Wide spectrum paleo‐diversity in sedimentary ancient DNA over the last ~14,500 years

Abstract: Most studies that utilize ancient DNA have focused on specific groups of organisms or even single species. Instead, the whole biodiversity of eukaryotes can be described using universal phylogenetic marker genes found within well-preserved sediment cores that cover the post-glacial period. Sedimentary ancient DNA samples from Lake Lielais Svētiņu, eastern Latvia, at a core depth of 1,050 cm in ~150 year intervals were used to determine phylotaxonomy in domain Eukaryota. Phylotaxonomic affiliation of >1,200 euk… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach provides information about Holocene and Late Pleistocene biota, including taxa that leave no morphologically identifiable remains preserved in lakes (see [13] for review). Thus far, the most common investigated aquatic organisms in sedaDNA studies have been photosynthetic bacteria and phytoplankton [18,34,[66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81]. Although macrophytes and some algal groups are typically well detected in sedaDNA plant surveys [24][25][26]81,82], there are few papers reporting the presence of zooplanktonic DNA [83,84] and fish DNA from lake sediments [85][86][87].…”
Section: Sedadna To Unravel Past Diversity and Composition Of Lake Biotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach provides information about Holocene and Late Pleistocene biota, including taxa that leave no morphologically identifiable remains preserved in lakes (see [13] for review). Thus far, the most common investigated aquatic organisms in sedaDNA studies have been photosynthetic bacteria and phytoplankton [18,34,[66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81]. Although macrophytes and some algal groups are typically well detected in sedaDNA plant surveys [24][25][26]81,82], there are few papers reporting the presence of zooplanktonic DNA [83,84] and fish DNA from lake sediments [85][86][87].…”
Section: Sedadna To Unravel Past Diversity and Composition Of Lake Biotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since 2008, researchers have successfully tracked organisms derived from terrestrial environments, using bulk sediments and focusing on the analysis of extracellular or total DNA 19 . These studies on bulk sediments targeted plants 2029 , mammals 24,30 , humans and/or animal specific faecal bacteria 3035 , and more recently other eukaryotes, such as fungi and worms 5,36 . The aim of such research includes the reconstruction of past biodiversity, vegetation cover, landscape, and climate changes, the nature of agro-pastoral activities and the relationships between humans and landscapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While past climate changes impacted the aquatic biota in both a large peri-alpine and a small arctic lake, the effects of eutrophication on the perialpine lake were stronger and partly overprinted the influence of climate forcing [13,29]. Despite this large potential of studying ancient DNA in sediment archives, there are only a few time series of aquatic microbial eukaryotic communities covering the entire Holocene [30,31] and none concerning boreal or alpine lakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%