1991
DOI: 10.1177/003232929101900202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From National Corporatism to Transnational Pluralism: Organized Interests in the Single European Market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
162
1
16

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 575 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
162
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…As argued by Eising (2008), there has never been much scholarly consensus about whether the EU model can, in principle, be defined as corporatist or pluralist, which affects further conceptual work on the implications of this model. While Streeck and Schmitter (1991) describe the EU model as lacking corporatist features, Schmidt makes a point about its quasi-pluralist character whereas Kohler-Koch (2006) makes a well-known argument about its network character. On the other hand, as argued by Falkner (2000), controversial findings are produced by a strategy of looking at member states as units of analysis and the country level as a level of analysis.…”
Section: Europeanisation Of Interest Intermediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As argued by Eising (2008), there has never been much scholarly consensus about whether the EU model can, in principle, be defined as corporatist or pluralist, which affects further conceptual work on the implications of this model. While Streeck and Schmitter (1991) describe the EU model as lacking corporatist features, Schmidt makes a point about its quasi-pluralist character whereas Kohler-Koch (2006) makes a well-known argument about its network character. On the other hand, as argued by Falkner (2000), controversial findings are produced by a strategy of looking at member states as units of analysis and the country level as a level of analysis.…”
Section: Europeanisation Of Interest Intermediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on interest intermediation refers to two major ideal types of interactions -corporatism and pluralism (Streeck and Schmitter 1991). The main distinction between the two is how the problem of access is solved.…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En realidad, esta no es la primera vez que algunos autores anticipan la defunción del corporatismo como consecuencia de la pérdida de capacidad de presión de los sindicatos y del debilitamiento del conflicto de clase (Lash y Urry 1987;Pierson 1994;Grahl y Teague 1997). Como tampoco es la primera ocasión en la que se cuestiona la pérdida de coherencia del estado-nación como marco de formulación política ante el empuje de la integración europea y de la globalización (Streeck y Schmitter 1991). Los pactos sociales ya experimentaron un importante declive a finales de la década de los ochenta.…”
Section: Pactos Sociales E Intercambio Políticounclassified
“…Se dice que las economías de accionistas (del mercado bursátil) dan primacía a los mecanismos de mercado y a los derechos preponderantes de los inversores; las economías de participantes (asistencia social) equilibran estos derechos de los accionistas con los de otras partes interesadas en la empresa y la sociedad. Con ello, moderan los efectos de los mercados mediante la regulación y la intermediación con grupos de interés entre organismos sociales asociados y coordinados u otros intereses (Streeck y Schmitter, 1991;Streeck, 1992;Hutton, 2002). Se dice que, en el modelo de los accionistas, la innovación y la competitividad se consiguen a través de mercados laborales flexibles, una regulación suave, altos índices de empleo, largas jornadas laborales y bajos índices de gasto social.…”
Section: Sumariounclassified