“…Thus, rather than adding increasingly more ties over time, as in preferential attachment models, we expect people with higher status to lose status in subsequent time points, both in relative and absolute terms. 10 The model does not directly predict the cycles of status found in adolescent ethnographies (Eder, 1985;Kinney, 1993), but the loss of status at the top does imply that mobility is possible: the more the status hierarchy is compressed, the more likely that idiosyncratic changes will alter the status rankings. The shrinking inequality and status mobility predicted by our model are difficult to reconcile, however, with the widespread perception that social status is relatively stable and mobility the exception (Bukowski and Newcomb, 1984;Eder and Kinney, 1995).…”