2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.07969
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From neutron skins and neutron matter to the neutron star crust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our inferences of crust properties are the first to extract constraints from PREX from direct EDF calculations of the neutron skin of lead and combine them with astrophysical data using unified EOSs with high density polytropes. Our results are consistent with our previous work focusing solely on the crust EOS [76,77] and the similar calculations of [47,74,75]. Our results for the ratio of the thickness and mass of pasta to that of the crust incorporating PREX with NICER+LV is ∆R c /∆R p = 0.172 +0.025 −0.124 and ∆M c /∆M p = 0.51 +0.08 −0.36 , compared with ∆R c /∆R p = 0.19 +0.05 −0.07 and ∆M c /∆M p = 0.57 +0.10 −0.17 from PREX data alone [77], and ∆R c /∆R p = 0.128 +0.047 −0.047 and ∆M c /∆M p = 0.49 +0.14 −0.14 from an analysis without PREX data, but incorporating information on the pure neutron matter EOS [75].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our inferences of crust properties are the first to extract constraints from PREX from direct EDF calculations of the neutron skin of lead and combine them with astrophysical data using unified EOSs with high density polytropes. Our results are consistent with our previous work focusing solely on the crust EOS [76,77] and the similar calculations of [47,74,75]. Our results for the ratio of the thickness and mass of pasta to that of the crust incorporating PREX with NICER+LV is ∆R c /∆R p = 0.172 +0.025 −0.124 and ∆M c /∆M p = 0.51 +0.08 −0.36 , compared with ∆R c /∆R p = 0.19 +0.05 −0.07 and ∆M c /∆M p = 0.57 +0.10 −0.17 from PREX data alone [77], and ∆R c /∆R p = 0.128 +0.047 −0.047 and ∆M c /∆M p = 0.49 +0.14 −0.14 from an analysis without PREX data, but incorporating information on the pure neutron matter EOS [75].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Neither astrophysical data nor PREX data narrow the uncertainty in the crust and pasta thicknesses, mass or moments of inertia; indeed, the uncertainty appears to increase significantly with the PREX data, an artifact of the increased likelihood of no pasta causing a second peak in the distribution [77]. Thus currently data is giving information about the most likely value, but not increasing the precision of the prediction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although there exists no direct and robust observational evidence of nuclear pasta, various tantalizing observations indicate its existence [23][24][25]. Numerous theoretical attempts based on molecular dynamics simulations [22,26,27], compressible liquid-drop models [28,29], Thomas-Fermi method [6,30,31] and nuclear density functional theory [32] point towards the possibility of the pasta structures near the crust-core transition density. The amount of these structures in the inner crust plays pivotal role in the explanation of various neutron star mechanisms such as crust cooling [25,33], spin period [24], quasiperiodic oscillation in giant flares [34], transport [35], shattering of the crust [36] etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%