2000
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/07/030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From noncommutative bosonization to S-duality

Abstract: We extend standard path-integral techniques of bosonization and duality to the setting of noncommutative geometry. We start by constructing the bosonization prescription for a free Dirac fermion living in the noncommutative plane R 2 θ . We show that in this abelian situation the fermion theory is dual to a noncommutative Wess-Zumino-Witten model.The non-abelian situation is also constructed along very similar lines. We apply the techniques derived to the massive Thirring model on noncommutative R 2 θ and show… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…∂φ∂φ + γ(1 − cos φ)] and replace ordinary products by * -products [12]. However, since the currents obtained as a natural extension of the ordinary ones are not conserved, the corresponding system is not guaranteed to be integrable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…∂φ∂φ + γ(1 − cos φ)] and replace ordinary products by * -products [12]. However, since the currents obtained as a natural extension of the ordinary ones are not conserved, the corresponding system is not guaranteed to be integrable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in the bosonization process of NCMT 1,2 models and their multi-fermion extensions, initiated in [28] by directly starring the usual Thirring interaction, we believe that a careful understanding of the star-localized NC Noether symmetries, as well as the classical soliton spectrum would be desirable.…”
Section: Jhep03(2005)037mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15) when the Dirac operator is taken in the adjoint representation, as defined in eq. (13). The interaction term S I of the action S[ψ, ψ, A] (eq.…”
Section: Perturbative Effective Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%