2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213916
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From North American hegemony to global competition for scientific leadership? Insights from the Nobel population

Abstract: Based on the entire population of Nobel laureates in science from 1901 to 2017, we show that North America’s rise as global power in science started in the 1920s. Following a transition period (1940s to 1960s), its scientific hegemony was consolidated in the 1970s. Yet since the 2000s, North America’s global leadership in science has come under pressure. In that time, its share of laureates across disciplines dropped, although it has retained its attractiveness as a destination for future laureates from Europe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further research should also focus on research systems like Japan that are outside Hollingsworth’s theoretical perspective, but which have received high-ranking scientific prizes in recent years and thrive with a rising number of Nobel laureates [ 25 ]. Another possible avenue for further research could be a broader disciplinary spectrum, including more high-ranking scientific awards in other disciplines, such as the Fields Medal in Mathematics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further research should also focus on research systems like Japan that are outside Hollingsworth’s theoretical perspective, but which have received high-ranking scientific prizes in recent years and thrive with a rising number of Nobel laureates [ 25 ]. Another possible avenue for further research could be a broader disciplinary spectrum, including more high-ranking scientific awards in other disciplines, such as the Fields Medal in Mathematics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to [ 25 ], we compiled historical data on the annual population by country. For the United States, we used census data, as available in [ 26 – 29 ]; for the United Kingdom and France, we retrieved population estimates, as available in [ 30 ] and [ 31 ], respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One account by Parsons' student Renée C. Fox describes how Parsons assisted his students in the circulation of their ideas by making publication avenues accessible or introducing them to influential intellectual networks (Fox 1997). However, this scattered and scarce evidence offers only limited insights into how "master-apprentice relations" (Heinze et al 2019) operate in the academic job market.…”
Section: Gatekeeping and Gate-openingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The charts can be read as follows, Geographically, from 2001 to 2020, women affiliated with institutions located in the U.S. received nearly twice as many awards (n=272) as their counterparts in other high-income countries (n=140) and considerably more than the rest of the world (n=15) (Figure 4). During these 20 years, women in the U.S. always received a higher proportion of all awards received by scientists affiliated with institutions located in the country compared to women in other highincome countries; however, women in the latter group substantially increased their share of all awards in their respective countries during 2016-2020 bringing them closer to achieving parity with their women colleagues in the U.S. (Heinze, Jappe, & Pithan, 2019). Although women in the rest of the world enjoyed a better success rate during 2016-2020 compared to women in the U.S. and other high-income countries (21% vs. 18% and 17%, respectively), they received only nine of the 187 awards given to women worldwide during these five years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%