2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-12723-7_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Past to Present: The Deep History of Kinship

Abstract: the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 397 publications
(493 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cross-cultural research is aimed at developing explanatory arguments for patterning discerned at the meta-level of a cohort of societies, each of which had its own, largely independent development as an internally structured and organized system (Narroll 1970), The rationale for this approach from an evolutionary perspective can be seen in the deep history of Homo sapiens (see Read 2019), including the historical division of our species into quasi-species; that is, a division into groups with boundaries at the intraspecies level analogous to boundaries at the interspecies level for other organisms, and where group differentiation has a cultural, rather than a biological, basis. Groups that we refer to as different societies, including different ethnic groups, self-identify and differentiate themselves from other, even behaviorally similar groups through internally formulated cultural criteria rather than externally through biological adaptation, as is the case for biological species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-cultural research is aimed at developing explanatory arguments for patterning discerned at the meta-level of a cohort of societies, each of which had its own, largely independent development as an internally structured and organized system (Narroll 1970), The rationale for this approach from an evolutionary perspective can be seen in the deep history of Homo sapiens (see Read 2019), including the historical division of our species into quasi-species; that is, a division into groups with boundaries at the intraspecies level analogous to boundaries at the interspecies level for other organisms, and where group differentiation has a cultural, rather than a biological, basis. Groups that we refer to as different societies, including different ethnic groups, self-identify and differentiate themselves from other, even behaviorally similar groups through internally formulated cultural criteria rather than externally through biological adaptation, as is the case for biological species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%