2019
DOI: 10.1353/aq.2019.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Penal to "Civil": A Legacy of Private Prison Policy in a Landscape of Migrant Detention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…REITs are now more common in a range of outsourced government care services, like hospitals, elderly care, and housing (Horton 2021), university student housing (Revington and August 2020), and public housing (Fields 2018). This shift places new pressures on firms to create or attract new income streams (such as electronic monitoring [Boe 2020]), to cut staff costs (Bauer 2018), and to redesign facilities to be easily repurposed (Lopez 2019). This shift also led CoreCivic and GEO Group to repackage their corrections operations as, first, specialised real estate and, second, essential government services.…”
Section: Outsourcing Detention Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…REITs are now more common in a range of outsourced government care services, like hospitals, elderly care, and housing (Horton 2021), university student housing (Revington and August 2020), and public housing (Fields 2018). This shift places new pressures on firms to create or attract new income streams (such as electronic monitoring [Boe 2020]), to cut staff costs (Bauer 2018), and to redesign facilities to be easily repurposed (Lopez 2019). This shift also led CoreCivic and GEO Group to repackage their corrections operations as, first, specialised real estate and, second, essential government services.…”
Section: Outsourcing Detention Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first salient body of scholarly inquiry has exposed the ways in which migrant detention facilities, despite their “civil” label, are in fact “immigration prisons” that function as sites of penal control (Dow 2004). Private prison companies often operate civil detention centers (Lopez 2019; Welch 2000) and employ guards who monitor all movements, meals, and personal visits (García Hernández 2014). Civil immigration detention also takes place within existing prisons and jails, the very same facilities that house individuals awaiting a criminal trial or serving a carceral sentence (Stumpf 2014; Lloyd and Mountz 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…98–99), contributes to mass incarceration, and she supports her position by exploring the legal differences between ICE detainees and “regular” non-ICE prisoners. Although the work by detainees in ICE facilities is similar to work done by others incarcerated in U.S. prisons (see Amuedo-Dorantes and Lopez 2022; Lopez 2019), the legality of imprisoned people matters; ICE facilities must ask detainees to “volunteer” in the prison’s work program (p. 92), which allows jails and prisons to extract profits out of detained immigrants in unregulated carceral spaces. This chapter stands out for its theoretical approach; although the theoretical argument about the political economy of private prisons makes sense, extracting profits from carceral labor is not unique to private prisons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%