2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.86.134202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From percolating to dense random stick networks: Conductivity model investigation

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we visualize these changes in the network, both experimentally using passive voltage contrast electron microscopy techniques, 20 and in simulations of nanowires as line segments connected in a two-dimensional plane by junctions that can either be capacitive before activation or resistive after activation. 9,19,[21][22][23][24] We compare devices of different electrode geometry: two flat electrodes, one serrated and one flat electrode, two serrated electrodes, and one pointed and one flat electrode. By extending our previously developed model of connectivity in these networks, 2 we can predict the effects of microstructuring electrodes on the activation voltage and sheet resistance of networks, confirmed here through experimental data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we visualize these changes in the network, both experimentally using passive voltage contrast electron microscopy techniques, 20 and in simulations of nanowires as line segments connected in a two-dimensional plane by junctions that can either be capacitive before activation or resistive after activation. 9,19,[21][22][23][24] We compare devices of different electrode geometry: two flat electrodes, one serrated and one flat electrode, two serrated electrodes, and one pointed and one flat electrode. By extending our previously developed model of connectivity in these networks, 2 we can predict the effects of microstructuring electrodes on the activation voltage and sheet resistance of networks, confirmed here through experimental data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of each contact depends on the potential difference between the two fibres and ݇ is a factor which allows for this effect. By equating the coefficients in our result with those of Žeželj and Stanković [13] for a uniform 2D fibre angular distribution we find ݇ = 0.1696. We determine the number of contacts per fibre in Section IV.C.…”
Section: B Effect Of Contact Conductancementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Fig. 7 compares the results of the MCM with the theory developed here, and the expression given by Žeželj and Stanković [13] for a 2D isotropic sheet with infinite contact conductance. In Figs.…”
Section: A Generation Of the Monte Carlo Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where n c is the percolation threshold and t is the universal conductivity exponent (equal to 1.29) [17], [18]. Eq.…”
Section: Electro-optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%