From photograph to face-to-face: Brief interactions change person and personality judgments

Satchell, Liam

doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.02.010

Cited by 20 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 75 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our study found that those who used a single error were perceived as less extraverted (i.e., more introverted), which some have noted is often appraised as being less socially desirable (Cain, 2012) and in line with the accruing data. This is somewhat contrary to previous research that suggests that for the trait of extraversion, judgments often improve with greater availability or richness of information (Satchell, 2019; Wall et al, 2013). However, previous research has utilized synchronous forms of interactions as the basis for personality judgments, whereas the current study was focused on perceptions based on a static context with no interactional properties.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

“…For example, a study by Wall et al (2013) found that judgments of conscientiousness were more accurate when based on textual cues than judgments formed in face-to-face settings, which are typically richer in nonverbal and visual cues. However, further research is needed to explore the impact of different quantities of cues on trait perceptions, especially given that other evidence shows richer contexts enable judgment-making for other traits (Satchell, 2019; Wall et al, 2013).…”

Section: How Do People Make Judgments?mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Less is more when rating extraversion: Behavioral cues and interpersonal perceptions on the platform of facebook.

Kaye

Wall

Hird

2020

Psychology of Popular Media

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We explore how specific behaviors on Facebook inform interpersonal perceptions. We conducted two studies that explored the impact of linguistic (Study 1) and emotional cues (Study 2) on interpersonal perceptions of a fictitious target. In both studies, a between-participants design was used, whereby participants were randomly allocated to one of three cue conditions, were presented with a Facebook profile that varied in the respective cue usage, and were asked to provide personality perceptions. Study 1 conditions varied in linguistic cues (accurate spelling, one error, and multiple errors), and Study 2 conditions varied in emotional cues (no emoji, one happy emoji, and multiple happy emoji). Study 1 found linguistic accuracy was related to perceptions of target extraversion. Specifically, the target was rated more extraverted in the control condition, with no errors relative to a single error condition. Study 2 results suggested that emoji cues did not have any significant impact upon trait perceptions. Taken together, the findings suggest that "less is more" when making judgments specifically for extraversion. Public Policy Relevance StatementOnline communication is a fundamental part of 21st century communication methods. This research highlights that aspects of our communication such as spelling accuracy may have a knock-on impact on how others judge us with respect to our personality. Specifically, we may be more likely to judge people as extraverted when they use more accurate spelling with their social media posts.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Section: How Do People Make Judgments?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Less is more when rating extraversion: Behavioral cues and interpersonal perceptions on the platform of facebook.

Kaye

Wall

Hird

2020

Psychology of Popular Media

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In an everyday setting an individual could change their own behaviour in response to perceived threat, by avoiding eye contact, crossing streets or even changing their own gait to appear more of a threat in response. These critiques are not new (Good, 2007;Neisser, 1980;Satchell, 2019) but are relevant when discussing the applied utility of this research. This is particularly important when considering the issues of stimulus presentation from a RAM perspective (Funder, 2012).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Is threat in the way they move? Influences of static and gait information on threat judgments of unknown people

Satchell

Mayes

Lee

et al. 2020

Evolutionary Psychological Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Availability of data. The data can be found on the Open Science Framework here: https://osf.io/c6aby/?view_only=53a8eed4e67d465a8d69f8414319805d. Stimulus material are not open access due to not requesting ethical permission to do so from target people at time of data collection 2 Code availability. The analysis code can be found on the Open Science Framework here: https://osf.io/c6aby/?view_only=53a8eed4e67d465a8d69f8414319805d Authors' contributions. LS conceived of the study and acted as project lead. HM led data collection. AL and LS conducted statistical analyses. LO conducted biomechanical data extraction. LS drafted the manuscript. PM and LA offered writing and theoretical support for paper. All authors approved the final paper. 3 Is threat in the way they move? Influences of static and gait information on threat judgments of unknown people

show abstract

“…Thus, it is unknown whether WHR interacts with other cues to inform sexual perceptions or judgments of sexual assault disclosures. This challenge to external validity occurs across social perception research where cues are often manipulated in isolation (see Jaeger & Jones, 2022; Satchell, 2019 for discussion of the importance of considering multiple cues in tandem). More broadly, there is little work considering how multiple cues combine to shape responses to disclosure of assault (cf., Adolfsson & Strömwall, 2017; Deitz et al, 1984; Sommer et al, 2016).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Waist-to-Hip Ratio Predicts Sexual Perception and Responses to Sexual Assault Disclosures

Paganini

McConnell

Deska

et al. 2023

Pers Soc Psychol Bull

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current work investigates the effects of target of perception’s waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) on perceivers’ judgments of sexual unrestrictedness and sexual victimization prototypicality. Studies 1a and 1b found that women with lower WHRs were perceived as relatively more sexually unrestricted. Studies 2a and 2b found that women with lower WHRs were perceived as relatively more prototypic of sexual victimization. Study 3 built on these findings to consider implications for responses to sexual assault disclosures. Perceivers disbelieved and minimized a disclosure of assault relatively more when made by a woman with a higher WHR. In sum, this body of work implicates WHR as a body cue that can inform consequential sexual perception. Thereby, this work identifies factors that could influence judgments of credibility of sexual violence reports, which may have implications for hesitancy to report sexual violence.

show abstract

From photograph to face-to-face: Brief interactions change person and personality judgments

Cited by 20 publications

References 75 publications

Less is more when rating extraversion: Behavioral cues and interpersonal perceptions on the platform of facebook.

Less is more when rating extraversion: Behavioral cues and interpersonal perceptions on the platform of facebook.

Is threat in the way they move? Influences of static and gait information on threat judgments of unknown people

Waist-to-Hip Ratio Predicts Sexual Perception and Responses to Sexual Assault Disclosures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About