2019
DOI: 10.1177/0267323119894481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From pleasure to politics: Five functions of watching TV-series for public connection

Abstract: This article addresses the question of how engagement with fictional entertainment can enable audiences to function as citizens. It argues that existing theoretical perspectives assume spurious links between the use of fictional entertainment and politics. This article mobilizes the theoretical perspective of public connection to show how audience’s engagement with fictional entertainment can forge manifest links to the sphere of politics. The article presents five functions that capture the main varieties of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis is based on qualitative data from a comprehensive project on media use in Norway (Moe et al, 2019; Nærland, 2019; Ytre-Arne, 2019). The aim of this study was to investigate cross-media use (Schrøder, 2011) and public connection (Couldry et al, 2010) through an open, informant-centered approach taking the perspective of users.…”
Section: Methodological and Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis is based on qualitative data from a comprehensive project on media use in Norway (Moe et al, 2019; Nærland, 2019; Ytre-Arne, 2019). The aim of this study was to investigate cross-media use (Schrøder, 2011) and public connection (Couldry et al, 2010) through an open, informant-centered approach taking the perspective of users.…”
Section: Methodological and Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This convergence, alongside the recognized intertextual influence of TV series, satire, and other forms of popular culture as important sources of sense-making (cf. Gray, 2006;Naerland, 2020), seemed to lead to mixed perceptions and confusion about what content experiences 'count' as news experiences. This relates to what Edgerly and Vraga (2020) call 'news-ness', the degree to which audiences are able to characterize something as news to varying degrees, even though they have difficulty defining what news 'is'.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatedly, there is a longstanding recognition that popular communication provides ample fodder for political engagement and audience sense-making, across age groups (e.g. Naerland, 2020). Although different fields of research may not agree on the 'learning effects' from 'soft news ' and entertainment (cf.…”
Section: Audiences and News Repertoiresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normative expectations of the public connection concept are that citizens should, in order for democracy to function, pay some degree of attention to a public world and to matters of common concern, but there are many possible routes to doing so (Couldry, Livingstone, and Markham 2010;Kaun 2012;Naerland 2019). The question of what it really means to pay attention (or not) to issues of common concern is key (Ørmen 2016), and fruitfully explored in an everyday user-centric perspective (Swart et al 2017;Hartley and Pedersen 2019) and as changing over time (Peters and Schrøder 2018).…”
Section: Complexity In Everyday News Use and The Need To Prioritize Dmentioning
confidence: 99%