From productivism to post‐productivism … and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture

Abstract

This paper has evolved out of a growing dissatisfaction with the relatively uncritical acceptance in contemporary debates that agriculture in advanced societies has moved from 'productivism' to 'post-productivism'. A brief review of current conceptualizations of productivist and post-productivist agricultural regimes reveals inconsistencies in current understandings these dualistic terms. The problem has partly been that the conceptual literature on post-productivism has largely failed to take into account the wealth of actor-oriented and behaviourally grounded research. Productivist and post-productivist agricultural regimes have also been conceptualized from a UK-centric perspective that has largely failed to discuss whether the concept has wider applicability within Europe and beyond. The paper discusses the time-lag and spatial inconsistencies in the adoption of post-productivist action and thought, and emphasizes that different localities are positioned at different points in a temporal, spatial and conceptual transition from 'pre-productivist' to 'post-productivist' agricultural regimes. The notion of the 'territorialization' of productivist and post-productivist actor spaces highlights the wide-ranging diversity that exists within the productivist/post-productivist spectrum, and that productivist and post-productivist action and thought occurs in multidimensional coexistence leads one to question the implied directionality of the traditional productivist/post-productivist debate. It is suggested that the notion of a 'multifunctional agricultural regime' better encapsulates the diversity, non-linearity and spatial heterogeneity that can currently be observed in modern agriculture and rural society. key words productivism post-productivism multifunctional agricultural regime territorialization political economy approach actor-oriented and behaviourally grounded approach

Are farmers in England equipped to meet the knowledge challenge of sustainable soil management? An analysis of farmer and advisor views

“…It has long been recognised that farmers need new knowledge and skills to take on the demands of sustainable agriculture (Winter 1997) but the suggestion has been that such knowledge is poorly developed due to the continued 'productivist modes of thinking' within the farming community (Curry 1997;Pyrovetsi and Daoutopoulos 1999;Wilson 2001). Today concern remains about whether farmers have the right skills set to deliver the Government's goals for sustainable farming (Defra 2004c;University of Reading 2005).…”

A historical synopsis of farm animal disease and public policy in twentieth century Britain

“…17 By 1980, food production was in surplus and criticisms were growing of the cost of agricultural support, and its damaging effects on the environment and animal welfare. These criticisms disrupted the post-war consensus that agricultural expansion was in the national interest, and encouraged the growth of a so-called 'post-productivist' outlook involving more sustainable farming systems [44,[90][91][92]. 18 These developments, and the policy responses to them, had important implications for animal health.…”

Property Rights in the Enviromental Regulation of Rural Space

“…En este sentido, Wilson (2001) afirma que uno de los atributos de dicho proceso es precisamente la pérdida de seguridad de los derechos de propiedad privados consecuencia por ejemplo de las regulaciones ambientales. Este debate sobre las líneas de transformación de la agricultura conecta directamente con el análisis de las políticas.…”

“…A conclusiones similares llega Marsden (1995) cuando afirma que las políticas que están tratando de fomentar el carácter posproductivista de la agricultura tienen el efecto de reforzar la posición de los propietarios de la tierra. Esta idea choca en parte con lo que afirmaba Wilson (2001) en relación a la pérdida de seguridad de los derechos de propiedad sobre la tierra como consecuencia de las regulaciones ambientales. Es cierto que estas regulaciones están alterando dichos derechos, pero lo están haciendo en gran parte de manera que se abren nuevas oportunidades de negocio para sus titulares.…”