1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1995.tb00818.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Public Administration to Public Management: Reassessing a Revolution?

Abstract: Changes to the study of public administration tend to follow those in the practice of the administration of government. The recent shift to public management is characterized and assessed both as a practice and a field of study. The result has been less a revolution in paradigm than the emergence of a vision of government which competes with but does not supplant traditional public administration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purpose of this article, we focus on the former. Liberalisation questions the role of the state, focusing on a shift toward a retraction of protected state monopolies, which includes both deregulation and privatisation (Gray and Jenkins, 1995). Deregulation relates to initiating a competitive market via breaking up monopolies, which involves a shift in the legal framework to foster market competition (Considine and Lewis, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of this article, we focus on the former. Liberalisation questions the role of the state, focusing on a shift toward a retraction of protected state monopolies, which includes both deregulation and privatisation (Gray and Jenkins, 1995). Deregulation relates to initiating a competitive market via breaking up monopolies, which involves a shift in the legal framework to foster market competition (Considine and Lewis, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…communication and organization) (Amit & Schoemaker, 1993;Butler, 2003;Devas, 1997;Guijarro, 2007;Intarakumnerd et al, 2002;Stapel & Schneider, 2012). Third, the quality of the public administration that refers to the extent to which public administration can be trusted and considered satisfactory by a community; the indicators are transparent processes, administrative procedures, and the coordination of different public institutions that (Comfort, 2007;Gray & Jenkins, 1995;Indraningsih et al, 2015;Kelly, 2005;Löffler, 2001;Porter, 2000). Fourth, the economic context (market) refers to the extent to which market conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In scientific research into the problems of public administration, there is mention of a high percent of turnover in personnel among civil servants, and that finding qualified replacements for them is becoming ever more complicated [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Structure Of The Federal Bodies Of Executivementioning
confidence: 99%