2017
DOI: 10.1080/03081079.2017.1319364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From quantitative to qualitative orness for lattice OWA operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) When the aggregation function is an OWA operator, the previous definition agrees with that given in [4] for OWA operators. Hence, in particular, the orness corresponding to the AND-operator is 0, and the one corresponding to the OR-operator is 1.…”
Section: Remarksupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(ii) When the aggregation function is an OWA operator, the previous definition agrees with that given in [4] for OWA operators. Hence, in particular, the orness corresponding to the AND-operator is 0, and the one corresponding to the OR-operator is 1.…”
Section: Remarksupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In this section, this concept is extended to any idempotent aggregation function defined on (L, ≤ L ). Note that, by [4], Remark 3, the definition given in [4] can be reformulated so that it still has sense in this wider context. Definition 7.…”
Section: Qualitative Orness For Idempotent Aggregation Functions Defimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the literature, there is also a definition of qualitative orness(Ochoa et al 2017), but this is out of the scope of this work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%