From Rights to Interests: The Challenge of Industrial Relations in Vietnam

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s Vietnam has achieved rapid economic growth based on the attraction of foreign investment within an unchanged political environment. Changing employment relations have presented a major challenge to the rights-based institutional forms of regulation of industrial relations established in the early stages of reform, which have proved slow to adapt to the new circumstances in which disputes are interest-based. The persistence of strikes has led the authorities to pay increasing attention to industrial relations issues, but their approach remains confined within the legalistic framework of the state-socialist era. Trade unions show little inclination or ability to stand up to employers on behalf of their members, while Vietnamese workers show a preference for direct action over representation through bureaucratic industrial relations structures. Journal of Industrial Relations

Why do corporate codes of conduct fail? Women workers and clothing supply chains in Vietnam

“…Unlike China, garment sectors are strategic priorities in Vietnam as the second largest export industry (Schaumburg-Muller, 2009;VITAS, 2010. In January 2009 the minimum wage level in Vietnam was less than half that of China and Indonesia and about one-third of the minimum wage in Thailand (ILO, 2009) The MNC codes' key provision of a right to freedom of association clashes with the restriction to officially recognized bodies in Vietnam and China (Clarke, Lee and Chi, 2007;Josephs, 1995). Any anomalous, independent workplace unions are effectively nonadversarial and pro-management, yet such entities can still appear as a panacea to supersede and facilitate other unenforceable standards.…”

Multinational enterprises and industrial relations: A research agenda for the 21st century

“…They argue that in China the state takes a negative view of informal strike action and is ready to use the full force of its repressive apparatus in order to retain and protect FDI. In Vietnam, on the other hand, wild cat strikes in the export industries have grown exponentially (Chi, 2013;Clarke et al, 2007;Van Gramberg et al, 2013) with suggestions that the Vietnamese government turns a blind eye to such disputes as long as they are in the FDI sector and is more likely to intervene in strikes in state owned enterprises (SOEs) to protect its own interests. While there is a growing interest in the activities of MNEs from developing economies, empirical research remains relatively scarce.…”

Social Margins and Precarious Work In Vietnam

“…The primary reason for this, as put forward by scholar-activist Ms. Tuyet Huynh, is that "Vietnam's trade unions are still in between workers and employers" (interview, December 10, 2010). 15 One result is Vietnamese workers show a preference for direct action over representation through highly bureaucratic industrial relations structures (Clarke et al, 2007). These weaknesses prevent meaningful negotiations that might preempt workers from taking industrial action (Chan, 2011).…”

“…State-run trade unions have proven incapable of addressing the particular needs of these migrants, as will be demonstrated in a case study from Dong Nai. Although some union officials recognize the growing disconnect between union structure and workers' needs, the sustained frequency and intensity of wildcat strikes through much of the 2000s have clearly signaled the chasm between workers and their "representatives" (Clarke, 2006;Clarke, Lee, & Do, 2007;Tran, 2008Tran, , 2011 Migrants in Vietnam are often caught between two forces. On one hand, regulations on "spontaneous migrants" and the ho khau system create structures that presume limited mobility and fixed residence to access many social and labor rights.…”