2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.11.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From rigid cyclic templates to conformationally stabilized acyclic scaffolds. Part I: The discovery of CCR3 antagonist development candidate BMS-639623 with picomolar inhibition potency against eosinophil chemotaxis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the corresponding propyl-linked compounds 23c and 23d, the analogues 26b and 26d had significantly increased antagonizing effects on eosinophil chemotaxis, with IC 50 values of 0.034 and 0.010 nM, respectively, as compared to 25 nM for 23c and 3.2 nM for 23d. 54,[56][57][58] An interesting result was that the correlation between binding IC 50 values and functional effects was higher for the phenyl ureas substituted with H-bond acceptors or heterocycles than for the other substitutions. The reason for the apparent disconnection between CCR3 binding affinity and antagonizing activity was hypothesized to result from different affinities for different receptor conformational states that are involved in the various functional activities.…”
Section: E (N-ureidoalkyl)benzylpiperidines and N-arylalkylpiperidinmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to the corresponding propyl-linked compounds 23c and 23d, the analogues 26b and 26d had significantly increased antagonizing effects on eosinophil chemotaxis, with IC 50 values of 0.034 and 0.010 nM, respectively, as compared to 25 nM for 23c and 3.2 nM for 23d. 54,[56][57][58] An interesting result was that the correlation between binding IC 50 values and functional effects was higher for the phenyl ureas substituted with H-bond acceptors or heterocycles than for the other substitutions. The reason for the apparent disconnection between CCR3 binding affinity and antagonizing activity was hypothesized to result from different affinities for different receptor conformational states that are involved in the various functional activities.…”
Section: E (N-ureidoalkyl)benzylpiperidines and N-arylalkylpiperidinmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the series of compounds 28 (Table VI), 58 the cyclohexyl linker was replaced by various substituted propyl linkers in an attempt to obtain the same conformational rigidity as present in the trans-1,2-disubstituted cyclohexyl rings while improving selectivity for CCR3. This was done because it was thought that the superior effect of cyclohexyl-linked antagonists on chemotaxis as compared to the acyclic propyl-linked analogues was (partially) caused by this rigidity.…”
Section: E (N-ureidoalkyl)benzylpiperidines and N-arylalkylpiperidinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers at Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) identi- fied a series of arylureas, exemplified by compound 13, as potent CCR3 antagonists (Fig. (6)) [71]. Replacement of the propyl linker of 13 with a cyclohexyl spacer (compound 14) did not influence the CCR3 binding affinity but led to a 300-fold enhancement in the chemotaxis inhibitory activity.…”
Section: Chemokine Receptor 3 (Ccr3) Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first section provides an overview of reports where the authors have successfully minimized CYP2D6 inhibition during LO and reported significant structure activity relationships (SAR) at CYP2D6. These articles cover a wide range of therapeutic targets including dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitors [68], CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) antagonists [69], human urotensin-II (hU-II) antagonists [70], CC chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3) antagonists [71][72][73], monoamine reuptake inhibitors [74][75][76][77], kappa opioid receptor agonists [78,79], sodium channel blockers [80], 20-HETE synthase inhibitors [81,82], CB2 receptor agonists [83], H3 receptor antagonists [84], melanin-concentrating hormone receptor-1 (MCH-R1) antagonists [85], and chemokine CCR5 receptor antagonists [86].…”
Section: Survey Of Medicinal Chemistry Tactics Used To Reduce Cyp2d6 mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation