This essay examines a growing literature on postcolonial Black Britain that seeks to suture the ties between prewar and postwar histories of Black political activity in Britain. By examining how people of African descent articulated the political conditions of being Black in metropolitan Britain during the 20th century, recent studies have shown how non-state actors shaped ideas about the relationship between race and citizenship. In unearthing the myriad of ways that people of African descent navigated the politics of being both Black and British, this body of work has begun to offer critical perspectives on postcolonial Black Britain's place within the political history of the African Diaspora. Moreover, this essay argues that new work on Black Britain and the politics of race yields fruitful ground for dismantling some of the artificial historiographical partitions that have oftentimes separated metropolitan race politics in the postwar era from the broader history of empire, decolonization, and transnational anti-racist movements organized around the pursuit of Black freedom.For decades, the arrival of passengers aboard the Windrush at Tilbury Docks in June of 1948 served as the primary point of entry for understanding the formation of postcolonial Black Britain. Visual frames of newsreel footage documenting hundreds of West Indian men disembarking from the Windrush and sharing the optimism expressed in Lord Kitchener's famous calypso "London Is The Place For Me" provided powerful optics used to caption histories of how New Commonwealth migration facilitated what has been described as the "irresistible rise of multiracial Britain" in the decades following the Second World War. 1 More recently, however, scholars have been much more critical of the occlusions and silences embedded in histories, which take the journey of the Windrush passengers as "the originary moment" for understanding the development of postcolonial Black Britain and accompanying questions regarding 'race relations', citizenship, belonging, and notions of Britishness. 2 Historians, in particular, have lead the way in moving beyond the customary identifications attached to the Windrush in an effort to reflect the complexities and contingencies that informed racial (trans) formations in Britain during the 20th century. Whereas popular narratives about the Windrush generation largely centered upon the experiences of single West Indian men, Wendy Webster and Mary Chamberlain have documented the voices of Afro-Caribbean women and children and analyzed how gender and familial ties shaped the terms by which migrants made a place for themselves in British society. 3 Because the mythology surrounding the Windrush foregrounds movement between the Caribbean and Britain as a focal point of understanding the growth of multiracial communities following World War II, the work of David Killingray, Laura Tabili, and Rozina Visram has proven vital in detailing the wider 20th century history of global and inter-imperial migration from continental Europe, Asia, ...