From Seats at the Table to Voices in the Discussion: Antecedents of Underrepresented Director Participation in Board Meetings

Abstract

A corporate board's work is largely dependent on the collective contributions of individual directors. Thus, greater board diversity, with its commensurate knowledge complementarity, should stimulate better board discussions when members actively participate. Without the participation of underrepresented directors, however, the potential benefits of board diversity are lost. Herein we examine the drivers of underrepresented directors' participation in board meetings. Departing from prior studies that often used a single-level, compositional view of board diversity, we explore the antecedents of individual underrepresented director participation with a multi-level, multi-theoretic model. We find strong empirical support for our model, derived from detailed board of director meeting transcripts, offering several theoretical contributions to the literature.

Opportunity or Threat? Exploring Middle Manager Roles in the Face of Digital Transformation

“…It is also worth noting that the difference for automation budgeting in 2018 is no longer significant when we relax our assumption and compare the early 33 per cent to the late 33 per cent of respondents as also applied by Becker et al (2016) (instead of the conservative 25 per cent threshold we used originally). Further, to ensure that response bias is unlikely to threaten our results, we additionally conducted the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test (e.g., Tuggle et al, 2022). This test allows us to examine whether the two samples differ in terms of the distribution of budgeting automation.…”

Board diversity’s antecedents and consequences: A review and research agenda

“…Westphal and Stern (2007) show that both ethnic minorities and women directors are less likely to receive a board appointment than male Caucasians if they provide frequent advices, engage in ingratiatory behaviors, or attenuate CEO's control. In a recent study, Tuggle et al (2022) highlight that the presence of additional underrepresented (i.e., female or Black) directors positively moderate the negative relationship between underrepresented demographic directors and their participation in board meetings.…”

“…First, diversity improves board's ability to perform its monitoring (i.e., making decisions on CEO pay, CEO dismissal, and financial reporting quality) and service roles (i.e., making decisions on IT investments and IPO valuation). Second, diversity may also moderate and change the interactions among board members, in terms of both cohesiveness of the underrepresented directors (Tuggle et al, 2022), and interpersonal trust and openness (Zhu, 2013).…”

Walking on the gender tightrope: Unlocking ESG potential through CEOs' dynamic capabilities and strategic board composition

“…Third, the male-dominated boardroom, combined with challenging negotiations on significant decisions, creates a context that is highly susceptible to role conflicts and ambiguities (Burgess & Tharenou, 2002;Koenig et al, 2011;Tuggle et al, 2022). Fourth, women tend to be more risk-averse than men (Cox & Blake, 1991;Croson & Gneezy, 2009), making them less likely to invest resources in initiatives with uncertain outcomes, such as ESG (Bazel-Shoham et al, 2023).…”