2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13046-020-01549-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From single gene analysis to single cell profiling: a new era for precision medicine

Abstract: Molecular profiling of DNA and RNA has provided valuable new insights into the genetic basis of non-malignant and malignant disorders, as well as an increased understanding of basic mechanisms that regulate human disease. Recent technological advances have enabled the analyses of alterations in gene-based structure or function in a comprehensive, high-throughput fashion showing that each tumor type typically exhibits distinct constellations of genetic alterations targeting one or more key cellular pathways tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The genetic hallmarks in this category are represented by the presence of an activated MAPK, of MSI/dMMR, and of kinase-fusion genes in variable proportions. Differently from conventional PDAC, if appropriately selected based on their individual genomic and molecular features, these special PDAC subtypes can be treated with specific therapeutic strategies (see Table 1 for a list of selected ongoing trials with agents targeting molecular aberrations that are enriched in KRAS wild type PDAC), representing an important step towards the establishment of precision oncology for patients with pancreatic cancer [ 71 ]. As exemplified by the recently reported “Know Your Tumor” initiative experience in PDAC [ 72 ], only a minority of patients might currently benefit from extended molecular profiling (46 out of 1223–4% - profiled patients received matched therapy in their experience).…”
Section: Clinical Considerations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic hallmarks in this category are represented by the presence of an activated MAPK, of MSI/dMMR, and of kinase-fusion genes in variable proportions. Differently from conventional PDAC, if appropriately selected based on their individual genomic and molecular features, these special PDAC subtypes can be treated with specific therapeutic strategies (see Table 1 for a list of selected ongoing trials with agents targeting molecular aberrations that are enriched in KRAS wild type PDAC), representing an important step towards the establishment of precision oncology for patients with pancreatic cancer [ 71 ]. As exemplified by the recently reported “Know Your Tumor” initiative experience in PDAC [ 72 ], only a minority of patients might currently benefit from extended molecular profiling (46 out of 1223–4% - profiled patients received matched therapy in their experience).…”
Section: Clinical Considerations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each omics discipline has different values different clinical settings. Considering the nature of this infectious disease, which needs the optimal treatment at the earliest timing, immune profiling may be a game-changer in personalized medicine for TB (Di Martino et al, 2020;Wicha et al, 2021). The current approach to confirming TB diagnosis needs drug-susceptibility testing in the form of bacterial culture, and it has a long turnover time for results (Organization, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlational nature of the analyses only allows speculation about causal relationships and needs to be further validated in a longitudinal design. Even though candidate genes as opposed to large-scale GWAS studies have come into disrepute, we believe that there is still a high relevance in connecting single genes and their respective pathways to specific neurocognitive processes and thus providing the opportunity for more specific interventions in precision medicine ( Deb et al, 2010 ; Di Martino et al, 2020 ). Another limitation of our design is that the procedure used here to indicate Pavlovian learning (task phase 4) was not designed to detect between-group effects but instead served to identify subjects who did not learn the Pavlovian contingencies ( Supplemental Information 8 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%