2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From smartphone data to clinically relevant predictions: A systematic review of digital phenotyping methods in depression

Imogen E. Leaning,
Nessa Ikani,
Hannah S. Savage
et al.
Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, they travelled farther, spent less time at home, and had greater diversity in the locations they visited. These findings are consistent with our hypotheses and with prior studies showing greater physical activity, less time at home, greater life space (the extent of movement through the environment during daily functioning), and engagement in a variety of activities (environmental complexity) are associated with better cognition, less depression, and reduced risk for MCI and dementia/ADRD [63,100,101,[116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, they travelled farther, spent less time at home, and had greater diversity in the locations they visited. These findings are consistent with our hypotheses and with prior studies showing greater physical activity, less time at home, greater life space (the extent of movement through the environment during daily functioning), and engagement in a variety of activities (environmental complexity) are associated with better cognition, less depression, and reduced risk for MCI and dementia/ADRD [63,100,101,[116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We examined many individual and contextual influences on mobility features to inform future studies in selecting covariates or moderating factors. This is a critical open question in the field of digital phenotyping [63], and our preliminary results provide important insights about which sociodemographic, contextual, and technology factors should be considered when interpreting this data. Age, education, sex, race, and cohabitation status appeared to be minimally associated with most mean-level and variability metrics, providing partial support for the objectivity of digital phenotyping features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations