2022
DOI: 10.4322/dilemas.v15n1.42944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Social Assistance to Control in Urban Margins: Ambivalent Police Practices in Neoliberal Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chile represents a case study of great interest. Carabinerosthe main Chilean police forceis the militarized institution with the largest staffing and budget among the police forces and has been extensively studied by social scientists in Chile (e.g., (Bonner, 2018;Dammert, 2019;Hathazy, 2018;Luneke et al, 2022). This is partly explained by the preeminent role it played during the Chilean military dictatorship in cases of human rights violations (1973)(1974)(1975)(1976)(1977)(1978)(1979)(1980)(1981)(1982)(1983)(1984)(1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989)(1990).…”
Section: The Chilean Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chile represents a case study of great interest. Carabinerosthe main Chilean police forceis the militarized institution with the largest staffing and budget among the police forces and has been extensively studied by social scientists in Chile (e.g., (Bonner, 2018;Dammert, 2019;Hathazy, 2018;Luneke et al, 2022). This is partly explained by the preeminent role it played during the Chilean military dictatorship in cases of human rights violations (1973)(1974)(1975)(1976)(1977)(1978)(1979)(1980)(1981)(1982)(1983)(1984)(1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989)(1990).…”
Section: The Chilean Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such contexts, the provision of urban services (such as water, sewerage, electricity and public lighting) is a critical point of contact between residents and the state (bureaucracy), with implications for state–society relations and securitisation. Debates on securitisation in Argentina (Auyero and Sobering, 2019), Bolivia (Goldstein, 2005), Chile (Luneke et al, 2022) and Brazil (Willis, 2014) acknowledge the relationship between the bureaucracy and citizens, but there is a tendency to focus mainly on bureaucrats pertaining to the security and judicial system – police, prosecutors, judges or the military – and the extent to which they contribute to the (in)security experienced by citizens. To move away from the judiciary-centred approach, Wacquant’s (2009) thesis on the neoliberal state is useful.…”
Section: A Socio-spatial Framework To Explore Urban Securitisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The headlines were collected from 2011 -when the Pacifying Police Units (UPPs) policy was introduced -until 2017, when the inter vention began. In both papers, we analyze ostentatious moralistic critiques of figures from both sides of the spectrum concerning this 'urban violence' (Werneck et al, 2021;Werneck, 2022b): on one hand, the grammar of crime (Rocha, 2020), especially the socalled bandidos ('bandits', criminals) -interpreted as actants making use of a disproportional degree of force (Werneck & Talone, 2019) and 'adrenaline' (Prado, 2020), especially in the form of traficantes ('drug traffickers': Werneck et al, 2021), ladrões ('thieves': Grillo & Martins, 2020;Caminhas & Beato, 2020) and milicianos ('militia members': Werneck, 2015b) -and, on the other, the grammar of the militar y police officers (Talone, 2020;Cubas, Alves & Oliveira, 2020;Luneke et. al., 2022).…”
Section: Final Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%