2019
DOI: 10.3389/fdigh.2019.00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Social Networks to Publishing Platforms: A Review of the History and Scholarship of Academic Social Network Sites

Katy Jordan

Abstract: Social network sites enable people to easily connect to and communicate with others. Following the success of generic platforms such as Facebook, a variety of online services launched during the mid 2000s in order to bring the benefits of online social networking to an academic audience. However, it is not clear whether these academic social network sites (ASNS) are primarily aligned with social networking or alternative publishing, and functionalities continue to change. Now 10 years since the launch of the t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is exemplified by IS in 'real-world' computerised systems where there is a lack of understanding relating to societal issues as evidenced by the problems experienced by social networking platforms (https://www.theguardian.com/ commentisfree/2018/aug/04/) (BBC: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-51511756). Ignoring the historical perspective of social network platforms and their publishing status [132], improper use of the platforms is reflected in disinhibition, abuse, and subjective reinforcement (based on expressed preferences and historical use patterns) or influence maximisation [133].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is exemplified by IS in 'real-world' computerised systems where there is a lack of understanding relating to societal issues as evidenced by the problems experienced by social networking platforms (https://www.theguardian.com/ commentisfree/2018/aug/04/) (BBC: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-51511756). Ignoring the historical perspective of social network platforms and their publishing status [132], improper use of the platforms is reflected in disinhibition, abuse, and subjective reinforcement (based on expressed preferences and historical use patterns) or influence maximisation [133].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies concerned with knowledge sharing and acquisition on SSNS, focus on specific features of the platforms, like question and answers [40,45], relational capital and needs-based mechanisms for self-disclosure behavior [39] or networking (metrics and interactions, platform demographics and social structure, user perspectives and Open Access) [46].…”
Section: Scientific Social Networking Sites Knowledge Sharing and Knmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this specific case we use the expression "knowledge utilization" [55]. The second situation consists in the acquisition of new competences in conducting scientific research [46,54]. The attitude of researchers towards SSNS is expected to influence knowledge use, both considered as knowledge utilization and competence acquisition (see Section 2.1).…”
Section: Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies concerned with knowledge sharing and acquisition on SSNSs, focus on specific features of the platforms, like question and answers [40], document sharing [39] or networking [44].…”
Section: Scientific Social Networking Sites Knowledge Sharing and Knmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSNSs are designed to support continued interaction among their members. Functions like "follow" a member on Researchgate [50] or different forms of feedback and alerts, allow the formation of virtual links [44], increase visibility of researchers and institutions [56] and generate loyalty towards the community [42]. Researchers participate without an immediate, specific objective: they participate because they value membership in the community.…”
Section: Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%