2000
DOI: 10.1080/13603110050168023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From 'Special Needs' to 'Quality Education for All': a participatory, problem-centred approach to policy development in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Report stressed the need for a paradigm shift, from a focus on "learners with special needs" to a systemic approach in identifying and addressing barriers to learning. Some of the key barriers in South Africa that render a large number of children vulnerable to learning breakdown and sustained exclusion are, for example, problems in the provision and organization of education, socio-economic barriers, as well as high levels of violence, HIV/Aids, and the negative attitudes of school communities towards diversity (Department of Education, 1997;Muthukrishna & Schoeman, 2000).…”
Section: Post-apartheid Educational Transformation and The Developmenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Report stressed the need for a paradigm shift, from a focus on "learners with special needs" to a systemic approach in identifying and addressing barriers to learning. Some of the key barriers in South Africa that render a large number of children vulnerable to learning breakdown and sustained exclusion are, for example, problems in the provision and organization of education, socio-economic barriers, as well as high levels of violence, HIV/Aids, and the negative attitudes of school communities towards diversity (Department of Education, 1997;Muthukrishna & Schoeman, 2000).…”
Section: Post-apartheid Educational Transformation and The Developmenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In South Africa, the history of education reflects extreme neglect and lack of provision for the large majority of children. Special needs education was fragmented not only by the Apartheid laws that enforced separation along racial lines but also by legislation and policy that separated "ordinary" children from children categorized as having "special needs" Muthukrishna & Schoeman, 2000). The theoretical framework, within which separate educational facilities for children with special needs were designed, focused on the medical model of disability (Naicker, 2005).…”
Section: The Conceptualisation Of Inclusive Education In the South Afmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provisioning of support services and education support at special schools and institutions applied mainly to White and Indian urban communities and did not apply to the majority of Black learners who constitute approximately 80% of the population; many of whom have had no access to education or are already mainstreamed in ordinary schools by 'default' where educational support services have been non-existent (cf. Muthukrishna and Schoeman 2000;Naicker 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Despite this tension, the inclusive education policy outlined a strategic plan to enable access and quality education for learners, particularly those with disabilities and impairment, and to address barriers within the system which result in a range of special needs (Muthukrishna and Schoeman 2000;Lomofsky and Lazarus 2001). A system of integrated support is being 'constructed', beginning in 30 designated school districts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, white paper was meant to alter the country"s education system by making a curriculum favourable for all disability learners needs including well trained staff. In reality the policy in south Africa advocated for disable education curriculum which is not only concentrate on academic but also in emotional and social perspective (Callan & Ed, 2018;Louise, 2013;Glaser & van Pletzen, 2012;Moloi & Motaung, 2014;Muthukrishna, Nithi;Schoeman, 2000;Donohue & Bornman, 2014;and ELSEN Directorate;Department of Education, 2001). Ethiopia policy which was adopted in 2006 reinforced awareness campaigns to sensitize stakeholders on disability development strategies in the society given the overlapping traditional values, a deep sense of spirituality and communal kinship responsibilities which was rooted.…”
Section: Development Of Disability Policies On Access To Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%