1995
DOI: 10.1002/bse.3280040304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From ‘start‐up’ to ‘re‐boot’: Product lifecycle strategies and competitive advantage in the computer industry

Abstract: The PC sector, following the packaging and car manufacturing industries, will increasingly be forced to acknowledge and account for its product base throughout the commodity's life, and beyond. The environmental problems being posed by electronic waste have been recognized and both the EU and the individual Member States are discussing solutions which may or may not include legislative action. In anticipation, product take‐back programmes are beginning to emerge within the industry and the economics and logist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second group of studies suggests tools and methodologies, such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), which support managers in the design of new products according to an ecological perspective. However, these methodologies often do not account for the economical and managerial consequences of`green' design solutions (Charlton and Howell, 1992;Rodgers, 1995;Linnanen et al, 1996;Welford, 1996). In fact, they are specifically addressed to those areas in the environmental profile of a product where managers should focus their response in order to minimise their environmental impact.…”
Section: The Literature On the Management Of Environmental Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second group of studies suggests tools and methodologies, such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), which support managers in the design of new products according to an ecological perspective. However, these methodologies often do not account for the economical and managerial consequences of`green' design solutions (Charlton and Howell, 1992;Rodgers, 1995;Linnanen et al, 1996;Welford, 1996). In fact, they are specifically addressed to those areas in the environmental profile of a product where managers should focus their response in order to minimise their environmental impact.…”
Section: The Literature On the Management Of Environmental Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LCA study requires a considerable effort and its results are specific for a given product, according to the EPD rules (Rodgers, 1995;Noci and Verganti, 1999). In this perspective, the shorter the product lifetime cycle, the lower the attractiveness of the environmental product declaration.…”
Section: Industry Level Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two factors should be mentioned here. The first is the idea, developed in Germany and other countries, that it is the producer, or the organization bringing a product to market, that should take back that product at the end of its life cycle (Rogers, 1995). The second is the concept of extending product liability to the area of environmental damage (as, for example, in the USA where it is required that the standards for the exhaust gases emitted by an automobile will be reliably maintained over a period of several years by means of an effective exhaust gas cleaning system).…”
Section: Environmental Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%