From State Control to Regulation to Privatization of Religion–State Relations in Israel: Kashrut Reform as a Case-Study

Abstract

Religion–state relations in Israel have been defined as following the status-quo agreement. This agreement, going back to the founding of Israel, allows recognized religious groups a monopoly regarding issues of personal status, and promises religious goods and exemptions to such groups (mainly, but not limited, to Orthodox Judaism). Since the mid 1980s, Israel has changed its economic policies, from a centralized economy to a privatized, liberalized system. This economic change introduced significant shifts within Israeli society. These include major recent changes in religion–state relations, most importantly the reform in kashrut certification, and growing commercial activity during the Sabbath. Such changes demonstrate a dynamic of state retreat, from a direct statist provision of religious goods, to the state either retreating completely, or re-situating itself as a regulatory organ. Using the kashrut reform as a case study, we suggest that the status-quo model can no longer adequately define religion–state relations in Israel, and is being replaced by a hybrid model, which includes libertarian, regulation-based, and the noted status quo attributes. We conclude with noting the significance of this development for the Jewish character of Israel.

Privatisasi Agama di Kalangan Muda Muslim Pada Era Disrupsi

“…Diskusi mengenai privatisasi agama telah dilakukan oleh para ahli dengan mengambil sisi kajian yang beragam. Dari diskusi tersebut dapat dipetakan menjadi beberapa aspek, pertama Abdulkadir & Long (2021); Bielefeldt, (2021); Perez & Rosman, (2022) fokus pembahasan mengenai privatisasi agama yang disebabkan oleh kebijakan pemerintah dan instansi publik. Kedua, Gałkowski & Antosz, (2022); Musrifah, (2021) fokus membahas mengenai sikap privatisasi agama secara umum dan Perez & Rosman, (2022) privatisasi agama di kalangan tua.…”

“…Dari diskusi tersebut dapat dipetakan menjadi beberapa aspek, pertama Abdulkadir & Long (2021); Bielefeldt, (2021); Perez & Rosman, (2022) fokus pembahasan mengenai privatisasi agama yang disebabkan oleh kebijakan pemerintah dan instansi publik. Kedua, Gałkowski & Antosz, (2022); Musrifah, (2021) fokus membahas mengenai sikap privatisasi agama secara umum dan Perez & Rosman, (2022) privatisasi agama di kalangan tua. Ketiga, Kim, (2022) fokus membahas mengenai dampak privatisasi agama yang terjadi di instansi sekolah.…”