2008
DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From statistical associations to causation: What developmentalists can learn from instrumental variables techniques coupled with experimental data.

Abstract: In this article, the authors aim to make accessible the careful application of a method called instrumental variables (IV). Under the right analytic conditions, IV is one promising strategy for answering questions about the causal nature of associations and, in so doing, can advance developmental theory. The authors build on prior work combining the analytic approach of IV with the strengths of random assignment design, whether the experiment is conducted in the lab setting or in the "real world." The approach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
144
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
144
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Any observed relationship may be partly or fully driven by omitted variables and the estimated relation could be higher, lower, or of a different sign than the actual causal relation. The confounding effect of endogeneity on estimates is one of the biggest methodological problems in management and psychology research today (Antonakis, et al, 2010;Bascle, 2008;Billings & Wroten, 1978;Duncan, Magnusson, & Ludwig, 2004;Gennetian, Magnuson, & Morris, 2008;Hamilton & Nickerson, 2003;Larcker & Rusticus, 2010). It is a problem that has mostly been ignored by researchers in the past and mostly plagues non-experimental research (but also experimental research too, for example, when testing mediation in the case of an endogenous mediator).…”
Section: Trends In Quantitative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Any observed relationship may be partly or fully driven by omitted variables and the estimated relation could be higher, lower, or of a different sign than the actual causal relation. The confounding effect of endogeneity on estimates is one of the biggest methodological problems in management and psychology research today (Antonakis, et al, 2010;Bascle, 2008;Billings & Wroten, 1978;Duncan, Magnusson, & Ludwig, 2004;Gennetian, Magnuson, & Morris, 2008;Hamilton & Nickerson, 2003;Larcker & Rusticus, 2010). It is a problem that has mostly been ignored by researchers in the past and mostly plagues non-experimental research (but also experimental research too, for example, when testing mediation in the case of an endogenous mediator).…”
Section: Trends In Quantitative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers must correctly model this source of endogeneity bias by using two-stage least squares regression or by allowing the disturbances of the endogenous variables to correlate in the context of a SEM model (refer to the following for detailed explanations on testing mediation correctly: Antonakis, et al, 2010;Foster, 2010;Foster & McLanahan, 1996;Gennetian, et al, 2008;Shaver, 2005).…”
Section: The Future Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of analyzing multisite experimental data by using treatment and treatment-by-site interactions as instruments in an IV analysis (Bloom, Zhu, & Unlu, 2010;Duncan, Morris, & Rodrigues, 2011;Gennetian et al, 2008;Ludwig & Kling, 2006), and recent studies have applied this methodology to the study of the determinants of children's development (Crosby et al, 2010;Duncan et al, 2011;Gennetian et al, 2008).…”
Section: Instrumental Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is predominately used in economics (e.g., Angrist & Krueger, 1991Angrist & Pischke, 2008); however, there is increased interest in using this statistical technique to test for causal effects within developmental research (e.g., Crosby et al, 2010;Gennetian et al, 2008). The IV approach requires the identification of variables (instruments) that are moderately to strongly related to the predictor of interest and that serve as the only conduit through which the predictor has an impact on the outcome.…”
Section: Instrumental Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation