2016
DOI: 10.21037/sci.2016.08.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From stem cells to comparative corticogenesis: a bridge too far?

Abstract: It has been hypothesized that the higher number of neurons in human cortex compared to the chimpanzee and other primate species is key to high cognitive function. Are human cortical precursors endowed with specific properties that drive greater neuronal expansion than in other non-human primates?Otani et al. 2016 addressed this issue taking advantage of comparative in vitro corticogenesis models based on human, chimpanzee and macaque pluripotent stem cells. Clonal analysis revealed a heterochrony of early deve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, neurogenesis has been shown to differ between primate and rodent species in the developmental timing of neurogenic clones, an evolutionary phenomenon termed heterochrony (27, 57). Although multiple factors are likely to govern the specific switches from symmetric to asymmetric divisions and then to differentiation and the lengths of the proliferative and neurogenic phases, we speculate that previously identified developmental timing regulators, such as LIN28, have roles in this process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, neurogenesis has been shown to differ between primate and rodent species in the developmental timing of neurogenic clones, an evolutionary phenomenon termed heterochrony (27, 57). Although multiple factors are likely to govern the specific switches from symmetric to asymmetric divisions and then to differentiation and the lengths of the proliferative and neurogenic phases, we speculate that previously identified developmental timing regulators, such as LIN28, have roles in this process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in the timing of neurogenesis between human and non-human primates observed in vivo vary from those observed in vitro, which may reflect certain limitations of the latter model systems, in particular regarding the development of an oSVZ. This issue has recently been competently discussed (Betizeau and Dehay, 2016). This discrepancy could be resolved by the conclusions from the mathematical modeling study (Lewitus et al, 2014), which suggests that for species with similar progenitor types and lineages, such as human and chimpanzee, the bulk of the difference in neuron production can be explained by simply prolonging the neurogenic period by a few days.…”
Section: In Vitro Models Of Cortical Neurogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In macaques, which are 'Old World' monkeys closely related to hominids, the pool of proliferative NSPCs is not only larger than in rodents, but it also remains proliferative for longer. Also, in contrast to rodents, a large AP pool can remain proliferative even when other APs have switched to neurogenesis, by generating mostly basal intermediate progenitors (bIPs) [28][29][30][31]. In neural rosettes, the APs of hominids (human and chimpanzee) were in turn shown to remain proliferative for longer than those in macaque rosettes [32], which may contribute to the larger hominid brain.…”
Section: Mitosis Cell Cycle and The Time For Proliferation Vs Differe...mentioning
confidence: 99%