2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From stiff plastic to elastic polypropylene: Polymorphic transformations during plastic deformation of metallocene-made isotactic polypropylene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
246
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(256 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
10
246
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of the degree of crystallinity of all samples of Figure 1 are reported in Figure as a function of concentration of stereodefects. For samples slowly crystallized in α and γ forms, the degree of crystallinity decreases only slightly with increasing concentration of rr defects, due to inclusion of rr defects in the defective and disordered crystals of γ form 29, 36…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the degree of crystallinity of all samples of Figure 1 are reported in Figure as a function of concentration of stereodefects. For samples slowly crystallized in α and γ forms, the degree of crystallinity decreases only slightly with increasing concentration of rr defects, due to inclusion of rr defects in the defective and disordered crystals of γ form 29, 36…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a stressinduced γ-R transformation was not observed during deformation at room temperature, 21 although it was postulated in the past by other authors. 19,20 It can be inferred that both destruction of γ crystals and formation of new R crystals are associated with partial destruction of lamellae within fine shear bands reported above.…”
Section: Stress-strain and Recoverymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The growth of a 1 under annealing is expected, as it reflects the improvement of structural organization of crystallites [22] . The conclusion, that the rate of inelastic deformation in the crystalline phase of iPP exceeds that of mPP, may be explained by a substantially larger size of spherulites in iPP, which weakly resist lamellar sliding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It was demonstrated that the viscoelastic and viscoplastic responses of mPP and iPP differ noticeably. In particular, mPP reveals a novel relaxation mechanism (associated with rearrangement of chains in the mesomorphic phase [9] and rupture of small crystallites [23] ), and a unique viscoplastic behavior (attributed to deformation-induced transformation of α crystallites into the mesomorphic form [9,22] , and formation of an oriented mesomorphic phase, due to lamellae fragmentation [10] ). Investigation of the mechanical response under long-term creep [24] and ratcheting [25] shows that the time to failure under conditions of creep rupture and the number of cycles to failure under cyclic deformation, with a stress-controlled program of mPP, substantially exceeds those of iPP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%