2022
DOI: 10.1177/14773708221097657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From structural time use to situational rule-breaking: Analysing adolescents’ time use and the person-setting interaction

Abstract: While unsupervised and unstructured socialising with peers is associated with delinquency, less is known about to what extent it fits within adolescents’ daily routine activities; that is, their general, structural time use. Furthermore, research informed by the situational action theory shows that unstructured socialising increases the probability of rule-breaking acts more for individuals with higher crime propensity. Hence, structural time use might explain patterns of unstructured socialising, and crime pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While STB data have been used to better understand the situational dynamics of crime (e.g., Chrysoulakis et al, 2022) and victimization (e.g., Averdijk & Bernasco, 2015;Engström, 2018), the methodology is not without its limitations. Hoeben et al (2014) list a number of weaknesses, which include the STB being a highly resource consuming method which assumes that the days included in the interview are representative of a longer period of time for a specific individual, with another weakness being that the use of hour-long time-slots risk missing shorter and overlapping events.…”
Section: Time-use Instruments In Criminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While STB data have been used to better understand the situational dynamics of crime (e.g., Chrysoulakis et al, 2022) and victimization (e.g., Averdijk & Bernasco, 2015;Engström, 2018), the methodology is not without its limitations. Hoeben et al (2014) list a number of weaknesses, which include the STB being a highly resource consuming method which assumes that the days included in the interview are representative of a longer period of time for a specific individual, with another weakness being that the use of hour-long time-slots risk missing shorter and overlapping events.…”
Section: Time-use Instruments In Criminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Malmö Community Survey is part of the Malmö Individual and Neighbourhood Development Study (MINDS; see e.g.,Ivert et al, 2018;Engström, 2018;Chrysoulakis et al, 2022).18 In the MCS 2012 the stratified random sampling approach meant that all neighbourhoods were categorized based on their population, with 40-50 respondents being sampled from the least populous neighbourhoods and 150-160 respondents from the those with the largest numbers of residents. In disadvantaged neighbourhoods there was an over-sampling of participants, since response rates were expected to be low (see.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%