2014
DOI: 10.4300/jgme-d-13-00416.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Structured, Standardized Assessment to Unstructured Assessment in the Workplace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6] These changes have prompted the GME community to critically review current assessment methods in order to identify workplace-based assessments that would provide meaningful data for CCC deliberations. 7 This article reviews theoretical advantages of chartstimulated recall (CSR), explores threats to validity due to construct underrepresentation and construct irrelevant variance using Messick's framework, and discusses possible solutions. The results can inform the GME community on considerations and potential solutions when implementing CSRs as part of an assessment system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] These changes have prompted the GME community to critically review current assessment methods in order to identify workplace-based assessments that would provide meaningful data for CCC deliberations. 7 This article reviews theoretical advantages of chartstimulated recall (CSR), explores threats to validity due to construct underrepresentation and construct irrelevant variance using Messick's framework, and discusses possible solutions. The results can inform the GME community on considerations and potential solutions when implementing CSRs as part of an assessment system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%