2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72892-6_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From T2 FS-Based MoGoTW System to DyNaDF for Human and Machine Co-learning on Go

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the dynamic assessment agent is not proposed to replace IRT. It combines PSO machine learning mechanism with IRT and applies it to education domain, especially for future humans and robots co-learning [35,36]. Additionally, to distinguish items from students' abilities, the proposed method shows the estimated performance level, namely below basic, basic, proficient, and advanced.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the dynamic assessment agent is not proposed to replace IRT. It combines PSO machine learning mechanism with IRT and applies it to education domain, especially for future humans and robots co-learning [35,36]. Additionally, to distinguish items from students' abilities, the proposed method shows the estimated performance level, namely below basic, basic, proficient, and advanced.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the proposed method can save the traditional paperand-pencil (P&P) test time and provide more accurate estimates of student what can do and what cannot do. Therefore, the proposed agent can help teachers evaluate students learning performance more efficiently, and it is recommended to use in the future classrooms for students and robots co-learning [35,36] based on IRT, but not to replace item response theory with the proposed method in this paper.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%