2016
DOI: 10.4000/norois.5999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From technological to social innovation: objectives, actors, and projects of the European rural development program (2007-2013) in the Puglia region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the innovative elements of the strategy is its multilevel governance process, which involves local authorities and communities and national and regional authorities in the formulation, implementation, and monitoring of territorial development strategies. Differently from the SNAI, LEADER is an EU program co-financed through the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and implemented by the activity of public-private partnerships, called Local Action Groups (LAGs), with the objective to engage local actors in the design and delivery of strategies, decision making, and resource allocation for the development of rural areas [62,63]. LEADER is commonly considered to be «one of the most influential sets of activities to address this spirit of mobilizing the countryside, through focusing on endogenous potential and activating local stakeholders across all sectors» [7] (p. 57).…”
Section: Data Collection and Qualitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the innovative elements of the strategy is its multilevel governance process, which involves local authorities and communities and national and regional authorities in the formulation, implementation, and monitoring of territorial development strategies. Differently from the SNAI, LEADER is an EU program co-financed through the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and implemented by the activity of public-private partnerships, called Local Action Groups (LAGs), with the objective to engage local actors in the design and delivery of strategies, decision making, and resource allocation for the development of rural areas [62,63]. LEADER is commonly considered to be «one of the most influential sets of activities to address this spirit of mobilizing the countryside, through focusing on endogenous potential and activating local stakeholders across all sectors» [7] (p. 57).…”
Section: Data Collection and Qualitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors recognize the importance of further characteristics and dynamics directly connected to agriculture for rural development, such as the role of short supply chains [31][32][33][34][35], the multifunctionality [11,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42], the geography of quality productions [43][44][45][46][47][48], and more extensively, innovation and knowledge [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. In particular, the most popular literature [50,[53][54][55][56][57]59,60] recognizes that innovation plays a central role in regional development, especially in favor of rural marginal areas [25,52,58].…”
Section: Territorial Conditions and Local Assets For Socio-economic S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is defined a convergence objective region, it is considered one of the most dynamic ones due to the significant investments in innovation for governance, planning and experimentation in agriculture, especially in the context of LEADER. It therefore represents a testing ground at national level (Labianca, 2016(Labianca, , 2021.…”
Section: Biodiversity European Policies and The Future Of Rural Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is favored by the orographic-environmental conditions and above all by the unceasing human activity which over the time has made land available through a labor of transformation, which however has often undermined the landscape features of large parts of the region (Fiori, Varraso, 2000). In this process of rural transformation an important role has been played by the numerous interventions over the years (Colamonico, 1960;Grillotti Di Giacomo, 2000) and more recently by the CAP, since the region depends heavily on European funding (Labianca, 2016(Labianca, , 2021Cejudo, Labianca, 2017).…”
Section: Biodiversity European Policies and The Future Of Rural Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%