2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10437-020-09372-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From the Bottom Up: Assessing the Spectral Ability of Common Multispectral Sensors to Detect Surface Archaeological Deposits Using Field Spectrometry and Advanced Classifiers in the Shashi-Limpopo Confluence Area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, advances in the technologies and datasets available for airborne remote sensing have expanded applications of spatial data for African archaeology. Airborne remote sensing (multi‐spectral imagery, Synthetic Aperture Radar [SAR] and Light Detection and Ranging [LiDAR]) alongside survey, near‐surface geophysics, and GIS analysis are increasingly used by archaeologists across the continent (Klehm & Gokee, 2020), often in combination with ground‐based techniques (Thabeng et al, 2020). Remote sensing for the identification of settlement distribution patterns based on aerial and satellite photos is common in open (vegetation) landscapes, especially in North Africa (Biagetti et al, 2017; Parcak et al, 2017) and southern Africa (Davis & Douglass, 2020; Sadr, 2016; Thabeng et al, 2019).…”
Section: Spatial Data and Remote Sensing In African Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, advances in the technologies and datasets available for airborne remote sensing have expanded applications of spatial data for African archaeology. Airborne remote sensing (multi‐spectral imagery, Synthetic Aperture Radar [SAR] and Light Detection and Ranging [LiDAR]) alongside survey, near‐surface geophysics, and GIS analysis are increasingly used by archaeologists across the continent (Klehm & Gokee, 2020), often in combination with ground‐based techniques (Thabeng et al, 2020). Remote sensing for the identification of settlement distribution patterns based on aerial and satellite photos is common in open (vegetation) landscapes, especially in North Africa (Biagetti et al, 2017; Parcak et al, 2017) and southern Africa (Davis & Douglass, 2020; Sadr, 2016; Thabeng et al, 2019).…”
Section: Spatial Data and Remote Sensing In African Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By employing tools capable of recording the microtopography beneath foliage in a way that visible photography cannot, this methodology can be used to identify anomalous landforms and features related to human activity, such as house platforms, walls, and sunken or cut features like pits, ditches and quarries. Multispectral datasets are increasingly employed to identify archaeological sites and to build predictive models of site locations based on topographic and environmental contexts (Khalaf & Insoll, 2019;Reid, 2016Reid, , 2020Thabeng et al, 2020). Several of these have involved the use of high-resolution imagery to flag core settlement areas and related hinterlands based on the environmental impact of cultivation and activity on vegetative health.…”
Section: Spatial Data and Remote Sensing In African Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thabeng and colleagues further explore the possibilities of detecting these ancient farming sites using hyperspectral analysis (Thabeng et al, 2020;. They find that collecting hyperspectral measurements of archaeological deposits on the ground can be used to train machine learning algorithms to directly detect these features in satellites, even those with coarser spatial resolutions (e.g., Sentinel-2, Landsat, etc.).…”
Section: Machine Learning and The Direct Detection Of Non-structural Archaeological Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there have been attempts to using machine learning for predictive modeling and the detection of subtle archaeological deposits with few -if any -structural remains. Some examples are "indirect" approaches (sensu Howey et al 2020) for locating archaeological materials (e.g., Davis et al 2020a), while others have successfully detected features like dung deposits and remnants of farming communities where no structures still stand (e.g., Thabeng et al, 2020;. For these "direct" approaches for archaeological prospection, the use of multi-and hyper-spectral sensors at extremely high spatial resolutions was key to their success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compiled 5 years of Sentinel-2 imagery by month using GEE (Gorelick et al, 2017; also see Supplementary File). SWIR has increased sensitivity to moisture content and can be used to distinguish mineral compositions of soils (Davis, 2017;Thabeng et al, 2020). One limitation of the Sentinel-2 data is that it has much lower spatial resolution (20 m).…”
Section: Vegetative Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%