2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2009.01056.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From the old to the new

Abstract: This study adopts a qualitative research strategy (Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis) to explore in-depth the lived experience of six forensic mental health nurses working within Scotland. This paper examines one of the core themes uncovered through analyzing the transcripts, "From the Old to the New." This theme, it is suggested, reflects these nurses' experience as they move from the previously accepted culture and practice of forensic nursing to a new "humanistic" and "interpersonal" perspective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with case study research, the results are not generalizable; yet, they are transferable to other contexts as they can provide suggestions for interpretation of experiences and for practice improvement (21). This study is in line with other studies, signaling difficulties in comparable transitions within forensic psychiatry, and a need for support and supervision to deal with this (22,23). Dilemmas of whether or not to touch a patient can arise in this transition, as is also noticed by Weiskopf (24).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In line with case study research, the results are not generalizable; yet, they are transferable to other contexts as they can provide suggestions for interpretation of experiences and for practice improvement (21). This study is in line with other studies, signaling difficulties in comparable transitions within forensic psychiatry, and a need for support and supervision to deal with this (22,23). Dilemmas of whether or not to touch a patient can arise in this transition, as is also noticed by Weiskopf (24).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%