1994
DOI: 10.1090/conm/170/01745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From the Riccati inequality to the Raychaudhuri equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where t ∈ I = [0, t (H )) and t (H ) is the first focal value of H along γ , is called a normal geodesic variation of γ along the hypersurface H [2,3]. For each fixed q ∈ H , let γ q be the geodesic given by γ q (t) = φ(t, q) and define φ t : H → M by φ t (q) = φ(t, q) for q ∈ H such that maximal geodesic joining q and γ q (t) = φ(t, q) has the Lorentzian distance t.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where t ∈ I = [0, t (H )) and t (H ) is the first focal value of H along γ , is called a normal geodesic variation of γ along the hypersurface H [2,3]. For each fixed q ∈ H , let γ q be the geodesic given by γ q (t) = φ(t, q) and define φ t : H → M by φ t (q) = φ(t, q) for q ∈ H such that maximal geodesic joining q and γ q (t) = φ(t, q) has the Lorentzian distance t.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So if −s M + s(H t ) ≤ −Ric(γ , γ ) under Ric(γ , γ ) ≤ 0, then we get the upperbound (8) less than (2). In particular, let H be a spacelike hypersurface in R 3 1 , then we get trivially (7) and (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The following important result on the existence of conjugate points does not follow from the previous theorem. The proof can be found in Hawking (1966a), Hawking and Ellis (1973, Proposition 4.4.2,5), Ehrlich and Kim (1994), Beem et al (1996) and Tong (2009).…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Compare Theorem 4·1 with [7] where it is assumed that there are no conjugate points along a fixed null geodesic, and the conclusion only concerns that geodesic. Compare Theorem 4·1 with [7] where it is assumed that there are no conjugate points along a fixed null geodesic, and the conclusion only concerns that geodesic.…”
Section: Integral Inequalities and Their Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%