2017
DOI: 10.5195/jyd.2017.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Theory to Practice: A Critical Review of Positive Youth Development Program Frameworks

Abstract: AbstracMany pos for describ eight sele considera programm categories historical reviews of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, researchers have argued that both personal and ecological assets are associated with PYD. Although different measures of PYD have been used to evaluate the effectiveness of PYD programs,78,79 there are overlaps amongs different PYD approaches, such as the emphasis on psychosocial competence. However, despite the overlaps amongs different strains of PYD models, there exist differences across the models under review.…”
Section: Observations and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, researchers have argued that both personal and ecological assets are associated with PYD. Although different measures of PYD have been used to evaluate the effectiveness of PYD programs,78,79 there are overlaps amongs different PYD approaches, such as the emphasis on psychosocial competence. However, despite the overlaps amongs different strains of PYD models, there exist differences across the models under review.…”
Section: Observations and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first reason the 4-H Thriving Model was developed was to improve 4-H program planning and evaluation through the use of a standard theoretical model. As noted by Arnold & Silliman (2017), there is no consistent model or framework of PYD used across the 4-H program.…”
Section: A Theoretical Model Of Youth Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason for this underutilization is that the Five Cs model lacked practical specificity on how to translate the research into effective youth development practice, leaving local 4-H educators uncertain about how to use the model in programming (Arnold & Silliman, 2017;. At the same time, however, it is important to note that theoretical models of youth development are always youth-context-time dependent, reflecting the "specificity principle" (Bornstein, 2019, p. 342) and underscoring the need for any theoretical model to be translated into practice with the specific youth, context, and time in mind.…”
Section: A Theoretical Model Of Youth Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goals of therapeutic camps align with positive youth development philosophy (Lerner et al, 2005), which seeks to improve adolescents' competence, confidence, connection, character, and contribution ("The Five Cs"; Lerner & Lerner, 2013). The Five Cs model is well-tested and remains an established model for youth development (Arnold & Silliman, 2017;Hamilton et al, 2004). Support for utilizing PYD in the outdoor therapeutic camp setting comes from research by Moxham, Liersch-Sumskis, Taylor, Patterson, & Brighton (2015) and focuses on individuals with mental illness.…”
Section: Outdoor Therapeutic Camps For Youth Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%